Quickoffice vs Office2 HD vs Documents to Go

Hello Everyone,

I've been researching the various iPad office apps that are available and was hoping for some first hand user experience from you folks.

Can anyone help with their experiences with:
Quickoffice
Office2 HD
Documents to Go

And perhaps anything else that may fit the bill.

These three applications all seem to, feature wise, fit my needs.
Editing of MS office documents with cloud synchronization capabilities.

Thanks in advance for your help.

Cheers.

MacBook Pro 17" 2.4 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 250G HD, XP Home under Parallels, Mac OS X (10.6.3), Time Machine, Airport Express, 64 GB iPad 3G, 16 GB iPhone 3G (OS 3.1.3)

Posted on Jun 11, 2010 9:27 PM

Reply
16 replies

Jun 11, 2010 11:05 PM in response to R. R. Andrew

I have all three of these apps. While I haven't done a systematic comparison of them yet for each of the MS Office apps, I believe I can make some generalizations that will serve as guides and cautions for you. First, on the positive side, all three of these apps do a good job of providing file import and export functions via both the major cloud services (Dropbox, etc.) and the iTunes file sharing via USB connection. That in itself is a major accomplishment for those of us early adopters that having been waiting anxiously to be able to share vital Office files between our laptops and our iPad's.

However, having said that, ALL of these apps have serious limitations compared to the native Office applications on our laptops. There are missing functions, odd renderings of the original files when viewed on the iPad, and other issues. My early assessment is that the app that has the most accurate renderings, most intuitive navigation, and reliably accurate edits is Quikoffice. FYI, Docs2Go is the only one that provides viewing and editing of PowerPoint files.

I'll have more to offer in another week or so. I intend to create a comparison matrix for these 3 apps and how they stack up on major Word, Excel, and PowerPoint functions. Stay tuned.

Jul 4, 2010 9:56 AM in response to R. R. Andrew

I'm holding on to my $15 uI'm in the same boat you are--trying to decide between QuickOffice Connect (QOC) and Documents to Go Premium (D2GP). I've been doing a lot of research online. The consensus seems to be that QOC has a better UI, but some people might need features only available in D2GP (for now, at least).

I saw on another forum that QOC can only work with files while online, so you have to be in a wifi hotspot on on the 3G network to do anything with it. Anybody know if it's true? If so, that's a huge strike against it for me, and I'd have to go with D2GP.

I'm holding on to my $15 until I find out for sure.

Nov 5, 2010 5:32 PM in response to Eeyore87

I got sick of lots of vague reviews either praising or damning this app, so I finally bought it (on sale for $12) to see for myself. I created .docx and .xlsx files on the iPad and on a PC, and then imported/exported them back and forth to see what happened. For everyone like me who wants specifics, here you go.

WHAT IT DOES:
On the iPad, QOC has 7 fonts and various colors, bold, italic, and underline. It supports paragraph alignment & indent controls. You can create bulleted lists (all bullet icons the same regardless of hierarchy).

WHAT IT DOESN’T DO:
Interestingly, the Viewer function in the Mail app displays Word documents much more accurately than QOC—you just can’t edit them. You can’t create any advanced features on the iPad—header/footer, autotext (page #, auto-date, etc.). You can’t insert graphics. Numbered lists may be continued/edited if they already existed in the imported document. You can edit the cell contents of existing tables, but you can't create a new table, row, column, or edit borders.

QOC cannot display or edit the following, but it does not “strip” them from the file: shaded table cells, strikethrough, super- or subscript fonts; page breaks and portrait/landscape orientation. Unsupported fonts will be displayed in--but not permanently converted into--one of the 7 supported fonts; as a result, line breaks and alignment may appear different on the iPad display than the original font in MS Word. Extra space between paragraphs will likely appear on the iPad and text will not be wrapped around a graphic correctly; both return to normal in MS Word if you leave them alone.

The following items will be stripped from the file: watermarks, page borders, hyperlinks, footnotes. Headers/footers were sometimes stripped, and sometimes passed thru.

SPREADSHEET
Basic font, number/date, and cell shading/border formatting options. Formatting retention seems good. Basic math, accounting, date/time, and logical formulas seem to transfer well, but more esoteric functions (e.g. COUNTIF, SUMIF) don’t; in that case, the value is displayed but the formula isn’t. These formulas aren’t stripped—as long you don’t edit those cells on the pad, the formulas will still be there when exported back to Excel. Charts will not appear in QOC, but are not stripped. Obviously, macros are out.

BOTTOM LINE: The word processor will meet the needs of 90% of users—letters, memos, and other (relatively) simple documents. Ditto for the spreadsheet. Frustration will increase with the complexity of the file, so if you want heavy-duty page layout tools, stick with “real” computer.

The user interface was good. File management and transferring files via iTunes or DropBox was easy.

So is it better than Pages/Numbers, or Document to Go, or whatever? I don't know--I don't have any of those apps. If you can live within the limitations above, then this is a worthwhile app. However, now that they're charging $19 for it, there's no $$ advantage over Pages & Numbers.

Mar 2, 2011 8:44 PM in response to Eeyore87

I like this review, it's comprehensive and you didn't leave much out. Except it was pretty impartial and when it came to comparison, you just gave up and admitted you didn't have much point of comparison. I don't blame you, as these apps are overpriced considering they are crippled. Why offer a word processor as an app if it cannot be up to snuff? You shouldn't have to to have a 'real' computer in order to run a word processor; and if you can run a word processor regardless of the platform, it should run like one and not have stupid inconsistencies in formatting.

That said, what have you discovered about Openoffice's handling of footnotes? I don't think it was supported when this thread was originally created, but I was wondering if that has changed because since then I think they have released some updates.

Message was edited by: hsimaH

Jun 4, 2011 4:54 PM in response to Eeyore87

What do you think is the best word processor. I want to be able to type documents, save them, transfer them to my PC then print to a wireless printer. I am trying to decided between the two Office apps and Documents to go or Pages. Also do I need the Dropbox app to transfer docs to my PC. I am trying to simplify this whole system. Can it be done. Thanks. Any input would be helps

Jun 4, 2011 5:27 PM in response to lezzalibra

I only use Docs to go and am happy with it, but can't review the others.


However, regarding DropBox - you do not NEED it to transfer docs, all of these can do it on their own, but I've found it much easier with DropBox. It automatically syncs files and folders, so you don't need to pick and choose which to carry over whenever you need them. Plus it gives a cloud backup wpand can be accessed from any computer.


In the case of Docs to Go, you do need the premium version to save to DropBox. The basic version can open from DropBox but not save to it.... Don't know if the others have similar limitations.

Nov 10, 2011 7:14 PM in response to R. R. Andrew

I bought Documents To Go Premium just over 2 weeks ago and got really disappointed with it. It is so unlike Microsoft Word and resembles more of Notepad that comes free with Windows OS on the PC. It can't even edit/create tables but in their advertisements they portray it to be the top app in terms of compatibility with Microsoft Word and even show examples of how tables can be edited (see http://www.dataviz.com/products/documentstogo/iphone/intact.html) and tells you to "...experience the freedom of being able to review and update any of the Word documents...Advanced viewing and editing features include touch navigation, cut/copy/paste, bulleted and numbered lists, fonts, embedded pictures, tables,..." In short, it was a major disappointment to realize I was misled on its (in)ability to edit/create tables.


As I still needed a good word processor on my iPad2, I went ahead and bought QuickOffice. Again, this app was unable to provide the required table function but I must say the Customer Support Team was much more professional in this aspect. They directed me to a forum where I could propose the function in their future release/update. Aside from this I would also say that QuickOffice is more user friendly and closer to Microsoft Office than all the other apps mentioned in this discussion. I would recommend it without doubt and keep my fingers crossed for the table function to be added soon.

Dec 10, 2011 3:43 AM in response to R. R. Andrew

Just a small point. I have and have used all three.


The one I have stuck with and used most is Office2 HD and the reason is simple. It has a very useful toolbar at the top that allows me to quickly change formatting. For instance I often use bulleted lists and it is very useful to type a heading, touch one button and then write a bulleted line, touch another and write plain, or numbered, or whatever text.


All three offer the faility to change formatting of course, it is just that Office2 HD seems much easier to do this on.

Dec 19, 2011 12:03 AM in response to itismehonest

I just got my iPad2, and am also on the search for a good office program. So far I haven't b een impressed with what I've been reading.


Two options I'm interested in learning more about:


Google Docs - from my limited use, it appears that it will create headers, footers, and tables. There are pretty good functions throughout. Several fonts, sizes, and paragraph choices. Not the prettiest UI, and a little difficult to use via touch, but it gets the job done. I really have only just played around with it, and did not create a full document or try to save, print, or send anything. I'll update when I have more experience with it.


Citrix Receiver - from what I've read, this may allow you full access to another computer, meaning you could remotely access your desktop and all of its programs. Supposedly MS Office works via touch (some functions differ, like double tap-drag for drag and drop and two-finger tap for right click). I have no experience with this one, only done some reading about it.


Does anyone have any more experience with either of these?

Dec 19, 2011 2:03 AM in response to rgray107918

Update - Google Docs


So I was indeed able to use the ipad to create and save a document that contained header/footer/table/picture. It was a little cumbersome to do so usiing the touch interface, but I was able to do it.


When you go to the google docs page, it brings up the mobile version, which is very limited. I selected the desktop version, which brought up an error message. I just clicked cancel on the message and it went away, and I was able to still use all of the desktop functions. Selecting a table was probably the hardest thing to do through touch. But I waa able to do it.

Dec 30, 2011 3:06 AM in response to R. R. Andrew

THese reviews are very valuable. What has been your experience with PowerPoint? I too am looking for a versatile capable system which will allow me to edit, expand and display PowerPoint. Reps present on their iPads but I failed to ask which system they were using. Demonstration is much simpler than editing and displaying. I look forward to your advice. Many thanks

Jan 14, 2012 2:16 AM in response to R. R. Andrew

I have only used DocsToGo and only use the spreadsheet function for basic editing whilst travelling.

Whilst it is good, one major frustration is that it if there is an unsupported function in the sheet (e.g. ROUNDDOWN, SMALL) it will only open read only. This renders it useless for any power user.

I would prefer it to warn me of the cells in question, but give me the option to open anyway or lock those cells and open anyway.

Perhaps when MS enter the fray, this will push these guys to 'up their game'.

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Quickoffice vs Office2 HD vs Documents to Go

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.