AaronShep wrote:
It's ironic
There's lots of irony surrounding the subject of Apple providing .epub authoring tools. With a rumored 22% of the ebook market out of the gate, Apple has their own ereader iBooks.app, but no corresponding iBooks authoring kit. TextEdit does not have its own Discussion thread, and iBooks.app's Discussion is tucked in under iPad. So, I sense a shyness on rapid development for the non-pro-publisher sector.
An iBooks authoring kit is about the only thing that makes sense to me. There are plenty of 90% capable apps out there to develop .epub documents, but when you narrow the attributes as they are supported in the iBooks.app the gap left by the odd 10% becomes very apparent. Without an iBooks.app authoring kit aligned with the iBooks.app reader app, there will always be issues. BUT an authoring kit would need to be offered for Snow Leopard (or OSX in general) because most of the author/publishers out there are not going to undertake preparing books from an iPad. Just sayin'.
So, what's the plan? I, for one, will keep offering my [feedback via whatever app or device feedback form I think fits|http://www.apple.com/feedback>. I've seen good results with that in years past, and I think that is as direct a line as humanly possible to those at Apple who can make these differences.
I didn't omit any text editor, but rather spoke to the word processor parent of this thread.