Neville:
"... +re-think & re-plan what you want to suit the options available+ ."
From what you're saying, then, is the underlying assumption that what I'm looking for is
not possible? If I have to re-think what I want to suit the options available, then the option I was originally looking for then must
not be available. Oh well!
" +Personally I can see no logical reason for you wanting icons placed randomly, so to speak, rather than have them snap to the nearest grid point+ ."
Well, believe me, I have very logical reasons for the manner in which I arrange my icons! I never said they were placed "randomly," but rather "eccentrically," meaning the placement has great significance to me though that significance may not be immediately apparent to an observer.
Not that it matters for the purposes of solving this question, but since you asked...
For example, I often will have a folder, opened into a large Finder window, and in that folder are dozens of files, in icon view. My job will be to arrange these files according to two different subjective criteria simultaneously -- say, in this example,
quality and
time-sensitiveness . But it takes me a few minutes to assess each file. What I do is I imagine the full-screen Finder window as a chart with an x/y axis, such that the higher an assessed file's icon is placed in the window, the better quality it is in relation to the other files, and the further to the right it is placed, the more time-sensitive it is. After I have gone through and assessed each file, and placed each one in the Finder window according to my criteria, I can visually see a "graph" of how good and how important each file is, with the icons at the upper right being the ones that are best and most time-sensitive. I then can prioritize my work by noting each icon's placement in this window.
Like I said, this may be "eccentric," but I've been using this technique for years and years and I find it quite helpful in the kind of work I do (which often involves breaking news and subjective assessments). Because of my way of using icons, it's important to me to
not have "snap to grid" turned on, because subtle and precise icon placement affects prioritization.
Yes, I realize there are other ways of doing this, but I really like this "on the fly" way of structuring my virtual desktop and work priorities, in which the actual files themselves become "data points" on a prioritization graph. Later, as I "process" files in batches, I move their icons to a different level - -hence my desire to have them all lined up neatly.
... +nor do I see the difficulty of placing manually those to be aligned - virtually identical time to achieve unless you have a large number to set to 1 alignment+ ...
Yes, it's true that the capability that I'm looking for would only save me a few seconds each time over doing it manually, but that's what having a user-friendly OS is all about -- saving a few seconds here and there when doing mundane tasks!
Barney-15E:
+With Snap to Grid turned on, you can hold down the command key while dragging and drop them anywhere. *With items selected, you can right-click and "clean up selection" (or use view menu). That will snap them to the nearest grid (even if you don't have snap to grid turned on). * +
A-
ha ! Now we're getting somewhere. That "clean up selection" control-click option (with "Snap to Grid" turned
off ) is the closest thing to what I'm looking for that I've encountered yet. It doesn't do exactly what I want, because unless the selected icons are already pretty closely aligned, they tend to jump to other open spots at the upper left of the window, and also when they do align horizontally they do so according to the grid spacing in the window's "Show View Options," which one would have had to remember to adjust ahead of time, because adjusting after-the-fact alters the positions of all the other icons in the window. But despite those drawbacks, "clean up selection" does in fact align solely those icons which I have selected. So -- thanks!
I truly wish that Apple would one day make the Finder be as infinitely flexible and arrangable as an Illustrator "vector graphics" document, but from what you're saying here, I guess that day hasn't arrived yet! Thanks both of you for the info, in any case!