rjp49 wrote:
This I understand, but when it involves a company heavily invested in HighTech with huge numbers of customers invested in those products it makes me wonder why they would walk away from all that goodwill?
Well there is more to it than goodwill and walking away.
The technology is always evolving at a rapid pace. In the long run it benefits everyone, this includes all the HighTech companies and end users. From the HT linked above "Apple has been working with developers to transition their apps, and in 2018 Apple informed them that macOS Mojave would be the last version of macOS to run 32-bit apps"
It never pays to get too far behind in the hardware or software—it only makes the transition more difficult and cumbersome.
I will give you one example of this current transition—
64-bit programs typically run a little faster, more importantly If your application is memory hungry like "your" Photoshop, 3D rendering, etc. having a 64-bit version will give the app access to all the computer's memory. 32-bit apps on the other hand are restricted and limited to somewhere around 2GB/ application. Full stop.
Do you remember when Apple phased out the PowerPC processors to transition to Intel x86 processors.
The PowerPC based applications were on the chopping block, and there was an uproar from end users.
Apple released Mac OS X v10.6 "Snow Leopard" in 2009 as Intel-only, removing all support for the PowerPC architecture. It was the last Mac OS X version that supports PowerPC based applications, by running the emulator "Rosetta."
Remember Rosetta(?)
Mac OS X v10.7 "Lion" dropped support for Rosetta, and the complaints came pouring in from end user very similar to the perspective you are making above.
We all survived, adapted and swallowed the change— and it was for the better. It is one complex industry to say the least.
You are welcome to send Apple Feedback http://www.apple.com/feedback
.