wolfgang2 wrote:
If you return to the original .... iBookAuthor ... was the right tool for professional bookwork.
I know that Pages was not made to be a professional tool, but why is Apple giving up all supports on professional software, wether it’s Grafics, Video or now literature ?
The only answer is .... money.
They don’t give a damm what users want ... they want the users, what they earn more money on.
Its a shame.
And .. yes I have to think about another platform.
When Apple turned from FCP7 into FCPX ... it was the same .... time for a change ... and that was a good decision.
Perhaps here it’s the same.
Sorry, I would not compare that move to FCP7 and FCPX. FCPX is still a major brand on the professional NLE market besides Premiere, DaVinci and (*yuck*) Avid. Of course, it was a quite fast transition, but most of the critics simply came from people, that did not feel comfortable about discovering new, faster and future ways of editing. However, FCPX is a powerful and fast NLE, which many big productions rely on. Same with Logic Pro X.
iBooksAuthor was indeed old and did not receive a lot of updates... I didn't like it either. However, I love working on text documents and small design work (which would not require to open InDesign or Photoshop) inside Pages. Pages, too, is a powerful software, if you spend time discovering all the things and features.
I'm sure, that it would be a great software to work on iBooks, if they would implement a better chapter manager, layout templates and interactive iBook widgets (quizlets, input fields, commentaries, etc.). If I remember right, widgets for iBooks were part of the old iWork suite (was it Pages 8?).
I fully understand and support Apple's transition from iBooks Author to Pages, but I don't get why they remove the core software from the market, when they haven't implemented all the necessary iBook features and workflows into Pages yet... That's quite strange.