Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

Is this true? Logic and hyperthreading

Is it true that logic doesnt support hyperthreading on 8 core Mac Pros, and that benchmarks in logic with quad cores are similar to 8 core mac pros?

Mid 2008 Macbook Pro 2.4G, Mac OS X (10.5.8)

Posted on Aug 2, 2010 1:20 PM

Reply
44 replies

Aug 3, 2010 4:29 AM in response to Ravich

Ravich wrote:
Is it true that logic doesnt support hyperthreading on 8 core Mac Pros, and that benchmarks in logic with quad cores are similar to 8 core mac pros?
Mike Conolly: Yes and yes, it looks like HT works but Logic is limited to using 8 cores total.


Any prove for the second "yes"? This is not true based on my findings, our quad cores (showing up as 8 cores in Logic Pro) are definitely not providing similar performance numbers like our similar clocked "real" 8-cores....

21th

Aug 3, 2010 7:23 AM in response to Ravich

Here's a specific benchmark. With the "evan" benchmark referenced in other threads, four cores with HT gives about 50 tracks while eight cores with HT at the same clock speed gave 57 tracks. So a slight improvement, but not much. On an i7 with a higher clock speed I was able to get 60 tracks (that one was a $1300 machine).

So it seems like there is a modest improvement from having eight full cores, but way smaller than you'd be seeing if all cores were used - I'd say it's close enough to call "similar" but that's a matter of opinion.

Aug 3, 2010 12:42 PM in response to Ravich

If you have an eight core machine and simulate a six core machine by disabling two cores (which seems to work fine in other apps), in Logic it gives performance that's worse than four core.

Whether that will happen with real six core machines or not, who knows, but based on how Logic supports multiple cores in general, it's hard to give them the benefit of the doubt.

Aug 8, 2010 9:58 AM in response to Ravich

Ravich wrote:
Where can I find current information on how other DAW programs (Cubase, DP, Sonar, etc) support multiple cores and hyperthreading? I'm starting to wonder about staying with logic.


You know, I see these types of threads often enough to have to ask you :

Is this "Hyperthreading" feature so important to you in your daily work, that you absolutely must have it?

Is it making your music / sound actually be of better quality? Is it mowing your lawn too?

I just don't get it when people get so caught up in the minutiae of a computer's innards, that they end up making music that I just don't care to listen to.

Or am I wrong, and I must now make an Album entitled "Hyperthreading"?

Cheers

Aug 9, 2010 5:53 PM in response to noeqplease

....what?

Do you just pull the trigger on whatever looks good and hope that it performs well for your needs? Hyperthreading increases performance significantly for applications that support it. Why wouldnt I be curious as to how Logic compares to other DAWs in that regard?

It has now been 18 months since the first 8 core Mac Pros with hyperthreading were released. Apple even cut the core clock speed from 2.8 down to 2.26 and then jacked up the price a few hundred dollars. Considering that after this long, logic still doesnt fully support those Mac Pros by any means, what on earth is the issue that you have with my question? I am looking to make an intelligent investment. Spending money on an 8 core machine to use in conjunction with a program that essentially treats it like it has 4 cores *****.

Aug 11, 2010 8:38 AM in response to Ravich

Ravich wrote:
Where can I find current information on how other DAW programs (Cubase, DP, Sonar, etc) support multiple cores and hyperthreading? I'm starting to wonder about staying with logic.


That's a good question. We know how logic runs - maybe other apps run better, maybe worse. I'm surprised nobody has done a review/comparison/benchmark across the different apps to compare cpu use.


noeqplease wrote:
Is this "Hyperthreading" feature so important to you in your daily work, that you absolutely must have it?


If you have sessions that are CPU intensive and you are getting errors running out of CPU (especially when half the cores on the machine are sitting there doing nothing, then yes it definitely is important.

It's really the same issue as deciding between how many cores to get, how much ram, how big/fast/how many hard drives etc. Audio is intensive on a computer and users need to be able to run their sessions without getting errors.

Aug 15, 2010 2:24 AM in response to Ravich

The way I see it, it's all a total crapshoot, and benchmark tests mean close to nothing. Here's how I'm looking at this, tell me if you agree...

Say you set up a benchmark test using only Logic plugins and a particular kind of interface, or maybe even built-in audio. Is that test supposed to compare in any meaningful way to the same computer (or even the same project) running substitute 3rd party plugins for those sounds and a different brand of interface?

Seems self-evident: it couldn't possibly compare.

Logic is like a "hub" for all kinds of 3rd party hardware and software. The likelihood of two people running the same system with the same plugins, track count (audio and MIDI), hard drive configuration, degree of disk fragmentation, and free amount of HD space on the system drive (which we know contributes to performance, yes?) is about nil.

Is this true? Logic and hyperthreading

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.