Does SD really speeds up the editing and sharing FCPX?

I purchased Crucial 8, hoping I would see the faster speed in performing tasks with FCPX

None whatsoever. Here are the results:

  1. The rendering time and making a movie is the same
  2. Reacting to scrolling through the timeline with effects has the same frame dropping as an external Seagate
  3. Copying large files from the desktop to both externals Seagate and Crucial 8 is exactly the same.


Besides being safer as it does not have moving parts, what are the real advantages?

Thanks.

Posted on Jan 17, 2022 4:51 PM

Reply
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Posted on Jan 18, 2022 1:32 AM

If I understand correctly, your internal drive is a rotating HD, is that correct?

That would be the limiting factor when copying files. Your external may be able to move data at, say, 500MBps, but your internal is much slower. That is why copying large files takes the same time - again, the internal drive is the bottleneck. If it can't serve the data at more than, say, 150MBps, then it can't possibly saturate the USB bus.


On the other hand, if you put your library and media on the Crucial drive, you should be able to edit buttery smooth.


It may be worth posting an Etrecheck report so we can check for other possible issues.

15 replies
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Jan 18, 2022 1:32 AM in response to Girshon Rutstein

If I understand correctly, your internal drive is a rotating HD, is that correct?

That would be the limiting factor when copying files. Your external may be able to move data at, say, 500MBps, but your internal is much slower. That is why copying large files takes the same time - again, the internal drive is the bottleneck. If it can't serve the data at more than, say, 150MBps, then it can't possibly saturate the USB bus.


On the other hand, if you put your library and media on the Crucial drive, you should be able to edit buttery smooth.


It may be worth posting an Etrecheck report so we can check for other possible issues.

Jan 17, 2022 5:08 PM in response to Tom Wolsky

iMac, the drives connected the same USB.


No noticeable difference. Rendering a short movie with a lot of effects, 17 min 35 sec minutes SSD and 17 minutes and 52 sec with Seagate. I copied 2 3GB of files simultaneously to Crucial and Seagate mechanical. The process finished at the same time.


I will do some more testing on a few other FCPX projects. Thanks.


Jan 18, 2022 9:43 AM in response to Girshon Rutstein

Girshon Rutstein wrote:

My library and my media are always on the external drive. Is it possible to replace HDD with SSD drive, and is it hard to do?


While it is possible to replace the hard drive, it is definitely not easy to do.


And, since your media and libraries are already in the external SSD, replacing the internal HD with an SSD would do very little in terms of editing performance.


It is unclear to me what the problem actually is, or if there is one. The only thing that you mentioned that could indicate a problem is dropped frames - but you did not say if this was an occasional thing, or what. An occasional dropped frame is no cause for concern, whereas if the system cannot playback anywhere near real time, that is another matter altogether.

If you turn off all the warnings about dropped frames, are you able to notice anything? If not, just use the application and don't worry.


In Preferences->Playback, UNcheck the box that says: "If a frame drops, stop playback".

Are you then able to edit normally?

Jan 18, 2022 10:02 AM in response to Luis Sequeira1

Thanks, Luis for saving me time and stress indicating that replacing the internal drive with SSD would be a waste. It was occasional working 'frames drop" so I turned off the message. And now I see skipping frames a jerky playback on some 3rd party plugins, which is OK, I can live with that. Let's see if the THunderbolt3 would make some difference. Editing and sharing movie-making works fine.

The main reason I started the whole conversation is because of the latest project. 3 Minutes video with Continuum color effects plugins would take 43 minutes to create a movie before I purchased the SSD, which did not make it faster.

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Does SD really speeds up the editing and sharing FCPX?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.