John, I'm trying to figure out if it makes that much of a difference if I import at Large or Full settings when I intend to use the Crop feature on some clips? It seems you're saying that importing at Full won't help in that case, it will end up the same as if I'd imported as Large? I had thought that importing at Full would give me more "pixels" to work with when cropping the footage and that it would therefore turn out better than importing at Large?
What you are saying makes sense Deborah. What I was referring to earlier is that if you import interlaced clips at Full then use certain effects, the _end result_ will be a file having the same resolution as one imported at the Large setting. However, if you are going to do any cropping, importing at Full would be a good move (as you say) because you are starting with a higher resolution file- just bear in mind that it will all get knocked down to Large on export, but may still give you a better result. Why not do a couple of short test projects - beauty is in the eye of the beholder. 🙂
I must reiterate that I don't have first hand experience with these resolution issues - just what I've learned from reading in the forum (I also have the first edition of Steve's e-book, but don't wish to plagiarise any of its contents).
I always import my interlaced AVCHD clips (1920 x 1080) at the Large (960 x 540) setting, use any features or effects I like, then export using Share to Media Browser either as Large or HD (1280 x 720). I get excellent results, whether viewing via my WD TV Live HD Media Player, or when producing DVDs through iDVD. Bear in mind that, currently, if you are using an Apple TV the maximum export resolution is Large.
You PS comment is correct, but the issue is with more effects than just cropping (see my earlier post re these). Perhaps Steve can offer some enlightenment here, given that he was the first to bring all this to our attention (as far as I'm aware).
John