1 TB vs 2 TB for HD video editing/storage

I'm all set to buy a new iMac. I think I settled on the quad core 28" i5 over the 21.5" dual core i5. But now that that decision is settled, I have a new dilemma. Lol.

While 1TB be more than enough? I plan to do alot of HD video and photo editing shot with my canon t2i dslr.

My current and soon to be replaced G5 iMac can't even play HD video, so I have no experience with how fast HD video eats up Hard drive space.

While checking out the new iMacs wt the apple store, I noticed that the OSX and applications that come installed alone eat up nearly 200 GB of hard drive space leaving about 800 GB. Although still ALOT of space, it got me to thinking.

Anyone hear have experience with this situation who edits had video/photography? I know more is always bette, but Did you find 1 TB hard drive more than enough? Or had you wished you gone with the 2TB?

Thanks for any and all comments.

G5 imac

Posted on Aug 17, 2010 2:26 AM

Reply
8 replies

Aug 17, 2010 9:30 AM in response to iregan

Ok, I do a lot of video editing on Macs, so here are my suggestions -

Get the 1TB internal drive and use the $150 saved to get yourself a good external 1TB FW800 drive. Keep the internal drive to less than 50% utilization. Use the external drive for media storage (video & photos) and working space, not your internal drive. (Lacie d2 Quadra 1TB drives are going for ~$150 / OWC Mercury Elite 1TB for ~$170.)

Also keep in mind that you should have a separate drive for offline backups, so two external drives would be a good idea - one for working storage, the other for backups. (Time Machine is a great backup utility, just not for video and definitely not on the same drive as your working storage; so if you are interested in using TM, that would be yet another external drive.)

As for disk space requirements, assuming use of iMovie or Final Cut Express, you should estimate about 45GB per hour of video. In a typical FCE project with 1 hour of source video clips, some render files & output files and an iDVD project, the total disk space needed will be somewhere between 65-110GB by the time the project is complete. You can get rid of some or all of that stuff when your project is finished depending on what you want to keep. (I keep the source media clips & FCE project files (with them you can reconstruct your project any time).

Aug 17, 2010 9:25 AM in response to iregan

I'd personally get the 2TB, AND then still get yourself an external as needed. External HDDs tend to have short life spans, so probably better to have ample internal storage that should be a bit more reliable long term.

And since you still have a G5 model, be sure to pick up the AppleCare plan. Virtually any repair on an iMac will more than pay for the cost of the AppleCare plan. You appear to be someone who holds onto computers long term, so may as well make sure it's covered for at least some of that time. But you can put that off to any time within the first year of ownership. So, you can let your bank account recover a little first.

Aug 18, 2010 8:35 AM in response to iregan

I came from a Power Mac Dual G5 and was always cramped for internal space even with external drives helping out. I’d say go for the 2 TB internal drive and add external drives for offloading and Time Machine as Martin suggests. The Time Machine drive can be a USB drive, but the first time you back up your system with Time Machine it will go quite a bit faster if you have the option of connecting it via Firewire 800. After that, the incremental backups via USB should be fine.

Aug 18, 2010 10:48 AM in response to MartinR

MartinR wrote:
Ok, I do a lot of video editing on Macs, so here are my suggestions -


Great suggestions, but one question: do you not find the FW800 I/O a bottleneck? This is not a loaded question; I'm holding out on SSD performance benchmarks for picking up a new iMac, but have also been contemplating going to a Mac Pro for my next investment (take a look at my post here for my thoughts).

If you are getting by moving HD footage around that renders to 45GB per hour, I think my concerns are moot as I'm nowhere near that sort of overhead and figured my bottlenecks were I/O related.

Aug 18, 2010 10:53 AM in response to ryansmith42

While SSD and SATA performance is faster than FW800, FW800 is not slow by any means. IMHO they are still the best solution for external storage due to the price/performance ratio of SSDs and iMac's not having ESATA support other than the OWC solution which OWC has stated may invalidate your warranty. If you don't care about your warranty then I'd take a close look at the OWC ESATA solution.

Regards,

Roger

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

1 TB vs 2 TB for HD video editing/storage

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.