"Adobe doesn't have a strangle hold on photography. They are very successful because they make a range of high quality applications, but they are by no means the only players in the field."
Happy to agree to disagree.
"And there are third party editors that do not rely on Apple's raw support - Affinity for instance."
Affinity defaults to using Apple's RAW Processing. They do make their own RAW processing engine but it doesn't include lens correction. If you want to do lens correction in Affinity and you don't use Apple's processing engine then you have to get lens profile and install it. You get the lens profile form ..... wait for it.... Adobe. So even with Affinity your options are Apple or Adobe.
" I think Apple's interest in photography is primarily based on helping phone users to maximise their experience through as much automation as possible, which is pretty much the antithesis of the raw shooter"
This really doesn't explain Apple introducing their own RAW format, Apple ProRAW. I think Apple is supporting and promoting their own format and not as focused on supporting its competitors. It makes sense but is a pain. Also, happy to disagree on this as well.
At this point we are so far off the topic I originally posted. Thank you for the assistance.
Cheers,
MP