Display scaling isn't available on Macbook Air but is for Macbook Pro?

I am connecting an M3 Macbook Air to a Dell display and it doesn't give me the usual "show more, show less" scaling options and it only lists a bunch of resolution options (none of which match up with the typical scaled options).


If I connect an M3 Macbook pro to the same display, I have the typical scaled options as I usually have.


The problem is that none of the resolution options available on the Macbook Air work. They're either low resolution or too small or too large. Both machines are on the most updated version of Sonoma. Why on earth would Apple have different resolution options for different M3 devices? This makes using the Macbook Air on this monitor useless.


Is there any way to fix this without downloading yet another app and tinkering with resolution settings? Seems a simple UI/UX solution Apple could provide. This is beyond frustrating.

Posted on Mar 13, 2024 4:58 AM

Reply
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Posted on Mar 14, 2024 8:09 AM

CONCEDE wrote:

Just the one single external display. exact same display, same TB4 cable, etc. and I get different resolution options depending on if i'm connecting it to my M3 MBP or M3 MBA.


So is the actual resolution of the display 5120 x 2160? (For an ultra wide monitor with an aspect ratio of 2.37:1?)


And you were trying to run it at Retina "like 3840 x 1620" and "like 3072 x 1296" settings? That would imply that the internal canvas resolutions were 7680 x 3240 and 6144 x 2592, and I believe those are the resolutions which would count for determining whether you had run into the display support limits of the machine.


  • Apple 27" 5K Studio Display = 5120x2880 = 14,745,600 pixels
  • Apple 32" 6K Pro Display XDR = 6016x3384 = 20,358,144 pixels
  • 7680x3240 canvas for "like 3840x1620" = 24,883,200 pixels
  • 6144x2592 canvas for "like 3072x1296" = 15,295,248 pixels


The M3 MacBook Air supports "one external display with resolution up to 6K" … and, when the lid is closed, can drive "a second external display with up to 5K resolution." You say that there's just one external display – so I'd think that the 6K limit would apply.


But the internal canvas for Retina "like 3840x1620" mode would have about 22% more pixels than the number of pixels on a 6K display (or the number of pixels needed to support Retina "like 3008x1692" mode for said display).


My Mac offers me the option to run a 4K display in Retina "like 3360 x 1890" mode, where the internal canvas has 25,401,600 (6720 x 3780) pixels, which is even more than you'd need for Retina "like 3840x1620" mode. But my Mac has a M1 Max chip that is theoretically capable of driving up to five displays, compared to the two (total) of a base M3 chip.


What chip is in the MacBook Pro that is offering the Retina "like 3840x1620" option? You implied that both of your notebooks are "M3 devices" – but is the chip in the MacBook Pro a M3 chip, a M3 Pro chip, or a M3 Max chip? As you go "up the line" within any particular Apple Silicon chip generation, you get more of various things – including video support. Maybe when you're trying to process more pixels than an actual 6K display has, higher-end chips have some (unadvertised) ability to do that, and base chips don't.

Similar questions

17 replies
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Mar 14, 2024 8:09 AM in response to CONCEDE

CONCEDE wrote:

Just the one single external display. exact same display, same TB4 cable, etc. and I get different resolution options depending on if i'm connecting it to my M3 MBP or M3 MBA.


So is the actual resolution of the display 5120 x 2160? (For an ultra wide monitor with an aspect ratio of 2.37:1?)


And you were trying to run it at Retina "like 3840 x 1620" and "like 3072 x 1296" settings? That would imply that the internal canvas resolutions were 7680 x 3240 and 6144 x 2592, and I believe those are the resolutions which would count for determining whether you had run into the display support limits of the machine.


  • Apple 27" 5K Studio Display = 5120x2880 = 14,745,600 pixels
  • Apple 32" 6K Pro Display XDR = 6016x3384 = 20,358,144 pixels
  • 7680x3240 canvas for "like 3840x1620" = 24,883,200 pixels
  • 6144x2592 canvas for "like 3072x1296" = 15,295,248 pixels


The M3 MacBook Air supports "one external display with resolution up to 6K" … and, when the lid is closed, can drive "a second external display with up to 5K resolution." You say that there's just one external display – so I'd think that the 6K limit would apply.


But the internal canvas for Retina "like 3840x1620" mode would have about 22% more pixels than the number of pixels on a 6K display (or the number of pixels needed to support Retina "like 3008x1692" mode for said display).


My Mac offers me the option to run a 4K display in Retina "like 3360 x 1890" mode, where the internal canvas has 25,401,600 (6720 x 3780) pixels, which is even more than you'd need for Retina "like 3840x1620" mode. But my Mac has a M1 Max chip that is theoretically capable of driving up to five displays, compared to the two (total) of a base M3 chip.


What chip is in the MacBook Pro that is offering the Retina "like 3840x1620" option? You implied that both of your notebooks are "M3 devices" – but is the chip in the MacBook Pro a M3 chip, a M3 Pro chip, or a M3 Max chip? As you go "up the line" within any particular Apple Silicon chip generation, you get more of various things – including video support. Maybe when you're trying to process more pixels than an actual 6K display has, higher-end chips have some (unadvertised) ability to do that, and base chips don't.

Mar 15, 2024 7:21 AM in response to Servant of Cats

I did mention the tech spec differences when I spoke with them but they didn't confirm that was the issue (or the person I spoke to wasn't aware). But I am thinking you are right and it's a limitation of the base M3 chip because another thing I've found as I've tried to use it with the external display to see if I can tolerate it is that when connected to the display, the performance of the MBA really lags and chokes on my workload but when I'm using it not connected to the external display it does a reasonably good job.


So that just leads me to believe that the MBA due to the base M3 chip cannot handle pushing to a monitor of this size (40" ultra-wide, 5k/2k display).


Perhaps it works fine with a smaller 4k display (I have a couple 32" 4k that I may test out for curiosity sake), but it is certainly looking like a limitation in the graphics capabilities of the base M3.

Mar 13, 2024 1:30 PM in response to CONCEDE

In the version of Ventura that I'm running, Displays Settings can show available "resolutions" either in "Larger Text … More Space" format, or as a list. Going into the "Advanced…" options lets you choose which view to use.


I'm guessing that you went into the "Advanced…" options on the MacBook Air at one time, and asked to see choices as a list, and that you can go in there and switch the preference back.

Mar 15, 2024 3:07 AM in response to CONCEDE

CONCEDE wrote:

Yes, correct. MBP is M3 Max.

MBA is the higher config M3 chip.


If you talk to Apple Support again, or if you provide feedback to Apple at Product Feedback - Apple, you might want to mention the SoC difference, and point them to this thread.


I'm thinking that the SoC is likely to be the key, and that if your MacBook Pro had been one with a base M3 chip, you might be running into limits similar to those that you encountered with the M3 MacBook Air.

Mar 13, 2024 5:41 PM in response to CONCEDE

Weird update, but still not solved. I tried rebooting several times earlier to see if that would allow the scaled options to show up again and it didnt work. But I tried rebooting later and they did appear this time. That said, I get different scaled resolution options on my Macbook Air vs. Macbook pro with the exact same external monitor.


The option to the right of "Default" on my Macbook Pro is 3840 x 1620 which is exactly what I want. But the same option using my Macbook Air is 3072 x 1296.


It doesn't make sense to me that there would be different scaled resolution options for an Air and a Pro on an external monitor.

Mar 14, 2024 7:05 AM in response to CONCEDE

Additional update... I called Apple Support who was equally confused as to why there would be different display resolution options between Macbook Air and Macbook Pro. They are "still looking into it" but said it may well be a limitation of the Macbook Air capabilities and may or may not be solved via software at some point.


This is unfortunate as I'll likely need to return the Macbook Air because it is just not functional when connected to the external display.

Mar 14, 2024 8:59 AM in response to Servant of Cats

the resolution of the external display is 5120 x 2160. The issue that I don't understand is when I connect my M3 Macbook Pro to the same display, I can run it at 3840 x 1620 which is the perfect balance for me.


When I connect it to the M3 Macbook Air, there are no options in between 3072 x 1296 and 5120 x 2160. The former makes everything too large and the latter makes everything far too small.


I don't get why I don't have the same 3840 x 1620 option that I do using my MacBook Pro?

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Display scaling isn't available on Macbook Air but is for Macbook Pro?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.