Efficiency core used with Logic pro x
Logic pro x is a Apple native software and as a DAW it does not use the efficiency cores in the silicone chips contrary to other brand DAWs like Reaper, Cubase and newly, ProTools. How can that be?
You can make a difference in the Apple Support Community!
When you sign up with your Apple Account, you can provide valuable feedback to other community members by upvoting helpful replies and User Tips.
When you sign up with your Apple Account, you can provide valuable feedback to other community members by upvoting helpful replies and User Tips.
Logic pro x is a Apple native software and as a DAW it does not use the efficiency cores in the silicone chips contrary to other brand DAWs like Reaper, Cubase and newly, ProTools. How can that be?
Applications can provide Quality of Service hints to the operating system which influence the operating system's choice of which type of core (Performance or Efficiency) to use.
Apple Developer – Optimize for Apple Silicon with performance and efficiency cores
Apple Developer – Apple Silicon – Article: Tuning Your Code’s Performance for Apple Silicon
It seems possible that Logic Pro is requesting a high class of service for all of its threads, and that the other DAWs are not. Just a conjecture, not based on knowledge of any of these applications' code bases.
Does it somehow fall short in the music it produces?
if not, I recommend you not try to micro-manage exactly how it does its magic.
Efficiency core used with Logic pro x