SuperMarina wrote:
Lightroom is NOT an alternative to Photos! Photos USED TO BE an app that allowed us to view and organize photos. It no longer is.
Lightroom is a photo editing app. Something else entirely. It does not successfully sync albums with my Mac. It also has a lot of extras I do not want which are distracting and time consuming to deal with.
And it is made by Adobe, so cannot be relied on.
Impressive.So much inaccurate information in one post. Well done:
Lightroom is NOT an alternative to Photos!
Yes it is. It sits in exactly the same place in the workflow as Photos does. Like Photos it's a photo manager. Like Photos it has non-destructive processing (just higher quality tools). Like Photos it can share your images across all your devices - the one difference being that it can also share to Windows and Android devices via native applications as well. Anything Photos can do, Lightroom can do too. And then some.
Photos USED TO BE an app that allowed us to view and organize photos. It no longer is.
Nope. Still is. That hasn't changed. The layout may have but the core capabilities of the app haven't changed one iota. And using block capitals and exclamation marks doesn't really help your argument.
Lightroom is a photo editing app. Something else entirely
I wonder if you're confusing Lightroom with Photoshop. No version of Lightroom is an editor like Photoshop. They are all parametric editors, they work in exactly the same way Photos. It's that alternative thing again.
It does not successfully sync albums with my Mac.
Perhaps you need to take the time to learn how to use it, because it certainly does exactly that for other people. I have more than 100k images managed by Lightroom and the organisation of these images is shared across all our devices.
It also has a lot of extras I do not want which are distracting and time consuming to deal with.
Again, I think we're back to the need to take moment or two to learn how to use the app.
And it is made by Adobe, so cannot be relied on.
And among the inaccuracies that is simply the daftest assertion yet. Adobe are the industry leaders in photography management and editing software. There is simply nobody that comes close. They are a huge corporation, whose applications are used world-wide, in professional and amateur settings. Their apps are the yardstick against which all other apps in this field are compared. I can understand that you may not like the applications, I can understand you may have a chip on your shoulder about the company. But there is no question whatever about Adobe's reliability out here in reality.