Best way to deal with .webm clips?

What is the best way to deal with .webm video clips to be used in FCP?


At present I am using HandBrake to convert them to .mp4 using the same frame size, frame rate and approximately the same bit rate.


Is this the best method to use or is there something better?

Mac mini

Posted on Jan 5, 2026 9:10 AM

Reply
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Posted on Jan 5, 2026 10:12 AM

For minimum generation loss convert with ffmpeg to some ProRes flavor and PCM audio with something like:


ffmpeg -i input.webm -c:v prores_ks -profile:v 3 -timecode 00:00:00:00 -c:a pcm_s16le output.mov
18 replies

Jan 5, 2026 6:07 PM in response to fox_m

There are pre-built binaries for ffmpeg you can download. However on MacOS I prefer using the Homebrew package manager which gives you access to many hundred useful utilities you can easily build from source code on your own machine. It requires no software development knowledge. I use ffmpeg I built for Apple Silicon using Homebrew.


Re webm, Shutter Encoder handles that, including hardware decode acceleration.


Internally webm uses the VP9 codec. Neither Premiere Pro nor FCP supports webm. Resolve does but Resolve internally uses ffmpeg for many non-professional, less-standardized codecs. That's how it achieved the "Swiss Army Knife" capability -- not because they natively wrote code for all those formats, but because they internally use ffmpeg. The tradeoff seems to be reliability. FCP is definitely more reliable overall.

Jan 7, 2026 3:02 AM in response to Joe Redifer

Sounds fine but just has one small problem for my occasional use . . . it costs £20.


NCH Prism has also been suggested. I gave it a try and found it has a nice clean GUI and plenty of customisable options but compared to HandBrake it was 30 - 40% slower which is a big deal if you are already irate at being forced to use .webm files in the first place.


Here's the link if anyone wants to give it a try . . . it's free for non-commercial use.


NCH Prism

Jan 5, 2026 2:35 PM in response to Matti Haveri

I have re-encoded webm files with it — as a matter of fact I tested it on webm files to get the screenshots (and I'm still using Mojave!)


I agree that ProRes might be overkill since webm are probably among the most compressed video files there are to begin with. There are Service options for H.264/AAC, but the max resolution is 1080p. It appears, however, that selecting 1080p will not enlarge a smaller res video [at least not webm files] but may "cap" larger res vids to 1080 (the ProRes option does not have a selectable vertical resolution option)... You also get the same frame rate in the re-encoded file as the webm file was encoded in ( I transcoded one that was 3fps!)


I honestly cannot tell the difference in quality between the webm files and the Service encoded files.


Is ffmpeg native to Unix? Or, does it have to be installed? (That's what I usually try to avoid...LOL).



Jan 5, 2026 9:48 PM in response to fox_m

fox_m wrote:

I have re-encoded webm files with it — as a matter of fact I tested it on webm files to get the screenshots (and I'm still using Mojave!)

I now tested that Services encode in Sequoia 15.7.3 and in my setup it still refuses to open .webm (and VP9 wrapped as .mp4). QuickTime Player behaves the same. On the other hand, Opus audio support was added in Sonoma. So maybe you have some add-on that enables VP9 (I have video support files that FCP 11.2 prompts to install)?


I have installed ffmpeg via MacPorts. It ignores many of the system libraries and software that is already available in macOS. "MacPorts pulls in the whole world" vs "Homebrew makes use of what you already have". Because of that Homebrew has some bad press because it sometimes conflicts with the unix-tradition and might cause problems with macOS pre-installed stuff. There are those pre-built binaries that avoid that. I use also other such Terminal apps and I'm too lazy to install from source and take care of all pesky dependencies and MacPorts has worked fine. Only a few times I have booted to an external test volume to install and try some app via Homebrew when it was not available in MacPorts (it is not recommended to have both installed).


BTW It is possible to execute ffmpeg commands via Shutter Encoder. Select input and output info in Shutter Encoder GUI and leave '-i input.mov' and output off from the commands you'd use in the Terminal. Also exiftool works but the last time I tested it had a very old version bundled and I asked the author to update also it.

Jan 5, 2026 1:36 PM in response to fox_m

AFAIK macOS doesn't yet natively support .webm input so that Services > Encoder Selected Video Files can't re-encode that.


I now tested in Monterey and there that macOS built-in Services encoder output is ProRes 422 and 32-bit PCM for H.265 input (the ffmpeg example above is ProRes 422HQ but there are also other ProRes options available).


I have not done any real quality tests and I guess ProRes might be overkill for most tasks.

Jan 8, 2026 9:46 AM in response to joema

After 20 years of HandBrake I've got pretty used to it but I just downloaded and tried Shutter Encoder. It seems more intuitive.


The interface looks prettier . . . like something that has been designed compared with HandBrake's rather hotch-potch appearance.


I speed tested both of them and they were very much identical which is not surprising as they are both based on ffmpeg


Anyway, I've always been a sucker for a pretty face so I will probably use it in place of the old girl.


Thanks for the heads-up.


Best way to deal with .webm clips?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.