12-core or 14-core? Looking to replace my M1 iMac for a Mac Mini M4 Pro.

Hi to all! Am looking to replace my 4-year old M1 iMac for a Mac Mini M4 Pro.

My M1 iMac has slowed down quite a bit since I got it and it's no longer a joy to use. I took the basic configuration, couldn't afford to choose more RAM or a faster chip.

  • The questions: is it worth it to choose 14-core instead of 12-core? What is the difference/purpose for more cores? For $300 more, if it's worth it, I will select that model... I will get the Mini with 1 TB storage, that's for sure.
  • The goal: to keep it as long as I can, so I can enjoy it longer or as long as it's possible to do so. I've got two external OWC Envoy SSDs for backups and stuff I really care for, as well.
  • The use: I'm just a casual user really, sometimes I'll work on photographs I've taken, sometimes I'll tinker around in GarageBand.
  • I was tempted, for my purchase, to add more RAM to the basic model 12-core instead, but for $600 CAN more, I simply can't afford this. I've looked around on the web, and not too much information is posted, that's why I'm asking here, you guys know. Thank you for any help you may offer me. Thank you for reading.


iMac 24″

Posted on Feb 4, 2026 2:32 AM

Reply
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Posted on Feb 5, 2026 3:45 PM

Diane Benoît wrote:

The questions: is it worth it to choose 14-core instead of 12-core? What is the difference/purpose for more cores?


The Mac mini is available with three chips:

  • Plain M4 – 10 CPU cores (4 performance + 6 efficiency), 10 GPU cores
  • M4 Pro – 12 CPU cores (8 performance + 4 efficiency), 16 GPU cores
  • M4 Pro – 14 CPU cores (10 performance + 4 efficiency), 20 GPU cores


Many applications depend more on the performance of a single CPU core, or a small number of CPU cores, than upon anything else. For those, even a plain M4 chip might run as fast as either M4 Pro chip, given enough RAM. For lengthy batch jobs that can make good use of multiple CPU cores, either M4 Pro might complete the task in about 2/3 of the time (plus or minus) that a plain M4 chip would require.


If you're doing heavy graphics work, you'll get a faster GPU as you go from 10 cores (plain M4) to 16 or 20 cores (M4 Pro), to 32 or 40 cores (M4 Max in a Mac Studio).


Often, the reason to go with a higher-level chip comes down to wanting support for more external monitors, more RAM, or more Thunderbolt ports – but even there, the plain M4 chip has enough improvements over the plain M1, M2, and M3 chips to let a M4 Mac mini have 32 GB of RAM and drive three monitors.


However,


• The use: I'm just a casual user really, sometimes I'll work on photographs I've taken, sometimes I'll tinker around in GarageBand.


I'm not sure why your current M1 iMac would be slow, unless


It might be better to try to troubleshoot the current system first, before going out to buy a new one.

Similar questions

33 replies
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Feb 5, 2026 3:45 PM in response to Diane Benoît

Diane Benoît wrote:

The questions: is it worth it to choose 14-core instead of 12-core? What is the difference/purpose for more cores?


The Mac mini is available with three chips:

  • Plain M4 – 10 CPU cores (4 performance + 6 efficiency), 10 GPU cores
  • M4 Pro – 12 CPU cores (8 performance + 4 efficiency), 16 GPU cores
  • M4 Pro – 14 CPU cores (10 performance + 4 efficiency), 20 GPU cores


Many applications depend more on the performance of a single CPU core, or a small number of CPU cores, than upon anything else. For those, even a plain M4 chip might run as fast as either M4 Pro chip, given enough RAM. For lengthy batch jobs that can make good use of multiple CPU cores, either M4 Pro might complete the task in about 2/3 of the time (plus or minus) that a plain M4 chip would require.


If you're doing heavy graphics work, you'll get a faster GPU as you go from 10 cores (plain M4) to 16 or 20 cores (M4 Pro), to 32 or 40 cores (M4 Max in a Mac Studio).


Often, the reason to go with a higher-level chip comes down to wanting support for more external monitors, more RAM, or more Thunderbolt ports – but even there, the plain M4 chip has enough improvements over the plain M1, M2, and M3 chips to let a M4 Mac mini have 32 GB of RAM and drive three monitors.


However,


• The use: I'm just a casual user really, sometimes I'll work on photographs I've taken, sometimes I'll tinker around in GarageBand.


I'm not sure why your current M1 iMac would be slow, unless


It might be better to try to troubleshoot the current system first, before going out to buy a new one.

Feb 4, 2026 4:17 AM in response to Diane Benoît

OK but there is probably nothing wrong with your iMac . . . as I said, computers don't slow down unless you have got some garbage somewhere causing the problem.


If Cocktail is a "cleaning" app that is probably the culprit. Never use apps purporting to speed up or clean your computer as they are snake-oil and most likely to cause problems.


Others on this forum will tell you to buy a Mac with the highest spec you can afford. Unless you are wealthy or don't mind being ripped off, that is bad advice as the basic M4 mini is more than enough for over 95% of users.


Of course you need external drives but you have those.


Increasing the internal drive is fiscal madness as an Apple 1 TB SSD will cost an extra £400 . . . but for just over £100 you can buy a 2TB NVMe in a USB-C caddy from a reputable manufacturer. Double the size for a quarter the price.


16GB RAM is also more than enough. Doubling it to 32GB will cost another £400 and will have little or no measurable effect on performance . . . it sounds good but that's all.

Feb 4, 2026 11:40 AM in response to Diane Benoît

Have you installed and run any "cleaning", "optimizing", "speed-up", anti-virus or VPN apps on your Mac? If you have please download and run Etrecheck.  The free version is sufficient.


Copy and paste the results into your reply. Etrecheck is a diagnostic tool that was developed by one of the most respected users here in the ASC to provide a snapshot of the system and help identify the more obvious culprits that can adversely affect a Mac's performance.


Copy the report



and after clicking on the Reply button use the Additional Text button to paste the report in your reply.



Then we can examine the report and see if we can determine the cause of the problem.


Feb 4, 2026 3:46 AM in response to Ian R. Brown

You probably don't even need a new Mac.


The M1 will not slow down unless there is something on it causing the problem . . . your question should have been, "How can I speed up my M1", as there is highly likely a simple cure.


For a start, how full is that 256GB SSD? It should never get more than around 85% which equates to having at least 40GB free. That's no problem as you can dump stuff on your externals and delete it from your internal.

Feb 4, 2026 2:27 PM in response to Diane Benoît

The current Mini should be supported for that long.

If you're into serious gaming the M4Pro with 24 GB RAM should be adequate.

Otherwise, the 12 core, 16 GB RAM model should suffice. That's what I have and I have no problems with it speed or load wise. Do not get a Mini with less storage than you have in your current iMac.


I don't see any of the usual suspects in the report.

Do you use USBclean on all MacOS drives? If so that could be part of the problem. It should be used only on Windows USB drives, FAT 32 or ExFAT formatted.


Do you have a lot of windows open in your browsers at one time? Doing so could also cause slowness in browsers as the windows manager for MacOS has to manage all of them.


The report indicated that it could not verify Time Machine backups. Do you use Time Machine for backups? If not is it SuperDuper? You should have a current full backup of your user data at all times to guard against drive corruption, accidental deletion and disk crashes.


Off topic: perchance are you related to Joan Benoit, the first woman Olympic Marathoner Gold Medalist? She's one of my heroes. I had just finished a 5 or 10 K race (it was so long ago I don't remember which) and watched her win the first ever women's marathon via a TV in a TV store window.



Feb 5, 2026 1:45 AM in response to Diane Benoît

You should not migrate everything from your old Mac to your new as that way you are transferring loads of garbage . . . the same garbage that could be slowing down your present machine.


Take this opportunity to start afresh transferring only what is absolutely essential in order to retain the pristine quality of a new Mac.


Ideally all third party apps should be installed afresh from the developer's website.

Feb 4, 2026 5:33 AM in response to Diane Benoît

I don't use the internal drive at all . . . I have both my minis booted (running) from external 2TB NVMes.


This means all the swap memory and virtual memory is supplied by the external. It's simple to set up as you just install the OS on it and set the Mac to boot from that.


Although the drive is slower than the internal it has absolutely no effect on the speed of the computer.


The mini is running from the 2TB drive on the left (£170 but now £270) and the 2TB drive on the right (£115 now £215) is simply for storage.


The 7 port USB hub (£25) allows me to add further drives and peripherals. The monitor is a 4K 27" Philips costing around £170. I use the keyboard and mouse from my old 2017 27" iMac.


Feb 4, 2026 3:59 AM in response to Ian R. Brown

I've been using Macs since 1996. My M1 iMac has 1 TB internal storage and still has 430 GB free. RAM was the basic model, 16 GB. Am running on the latest Sonoma. I hesitate to upgrade to Tahoe for a few reasons. In my experience, the older hardware tends to slow down more and more as you upgrade the OS, plus I'd have to shell out anyway for upgrading apps I use, like Cocktail, which I run every day religiously, and other stuff. It isn't as zippy as it used to be and I'd rather have a newer Mac, because at the age I'm at, this is probably going to be my last computer.

Feb 4, 2026 4:35 AM in response to Ian R. Brown

CORRECTION: 2TB NVMes now cost double at around £200


This tremendous increase in price over the past year is due to the demands of AI and cloud storage requiring vast numbers of RAM chips.


The manufacturers are prioritising the big companies so there is a shortage for consumers resulting in grossly inflated prices.


Eventually things will stabilise and prices will drop but as to when is anyone's guess.

Feb 4, 2026 4:37 AM in response to Ian R. Brown

I've been using Cocktail from Maintain (developer from Sweden) since 2005 or around that time. It works nicely, clears out garbage, caches and other things, periodic maintenance tasks, etc. I even used it way back when I didn't want to jump out of my socks first thing in the morning at the sound of the Mac's startup chime. Now you can set it so, muting the chime, in the system settings which is nice, but I have continued to use Cocktail to run maintenance scripts. And I agree with you, I won't pay the extra for RAM unless I really have to, that's for sure. As for shelling out for more internal storage, I would think it's an elegant solution when/if there is enough space left if it's still being used by the OS as virtual memory for certain tasks. I don't use the cloud to store my files, not very fond of it for many reasons, and I'd rather have those files close to me, hence the reason for the external OWC SSDs. I was even thinking getting Satechi's Mac Mini's M4 Hub & Stand with NVMe SSD Enclosure for more space. Thanks for all the information you give me.



This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

12-core or 14-core? Looking to replace my M1 iMac for a Mac Mini M4 Pro.

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.