I just came here because I was intrigued. I do not possess those devices so I'm not entitled to report any of this. I was speaking out my first impressions on that issue. It seems to me Apple prides itself as keeping what goes into their store quite close to their chest, so I'm suprised to see thrash like this. I believe it's going to be central as platform based appstores become the main repositories for software for non tech oriented people that very strong control and guidelines be implemented and that offending apps and devs be severely punished. Using children's attraction for novelty to suck their parents moneys for virtual garbage is really really low in my opinion. I don't want to single out this app really. In mean in general. It's despicable. How can they justify a 99$ treasure chest? Anyways, I have sympathy for those parents, whether they properly supervised or not etc. To those blaming the parents I would simply say: shame on you.
Honestly no. I don't believe parents have to read all the doc and figure out all the settings. This is an Iphone or an Ipad. It is marketed as THE lifestyle, simple, usable, intelligent device. ALL those settings should hence be blacklisted and unlocked with proper credentials. Think different really. In the sense, think non tech-savvy people with limited time and tons of responsability. Seriously. Or is this device setup as a casino slot machine would be?
As for Apple's liability, well, I'm not sure technically. But I'd argue that the burden should rest on any business(Apple, credit card emitter, dev, etc) before it should rest on the parents.
@deggie, well your argument is some form of neoliberal market freedom statement. Fair enough. I just believe in further protection for the consumer than that. I believe in more solidarity and less of that "it's not my business" rhetoric - more compassion really. But I will think about this whole ordeal further. I'm reacting to this issue and I've never been faced with it before. I may benefit from further thinking... I just think you shouldn't be judgmental or condescending. Further more, there is such a thing as predatory practices and there is legislation in force against such practices so it's simply wrong to imply that the market is a free for all and that a merchant can set any price for anything. You might benefit from further thinking yourself.
Good luck.
p.s. Steve this started as a reply to you but my post is really more a reply to the few posts I've read in the last couple of pages. It is not geared at you specifically.