Q: Advice needed... do we need FCServer?
I have read through similar questions on here, so pardon the redundancy of the question. I still have some questions though, and a situation that may be different from other posters.
We have a 5, going on 7 FCP license facility. 5 machines are running metaSAN over fiber channel. The metaSAN master machine is an XServe. The two expansion machines are going to be iMac's, connecting to the SAN via AFP.
We work mostly at uncompressed 10-bit for finish, pro-res occasionally for offline. We are not interested in FCServer for it's proxy generation, we don't want to flood our SAN with compressed files, we'd run out of space.
With that in mind... in your humble opinion, do we need FCServer?
Also, keep in mind, it would have to run on our metaSAN master XServe. I am concerned about the compatibility of this setup, although Tiger Tech says it's supported.
Would this give producers access to browsing assets if they are not on a FCP machine?
Any other helpful advice?
Thanks in advance for your time.
We have a 5, going on 7 FCP license facility. 5 machines are running metaSAN over fiber channel. The metaSAN master machine is an XServe. The two expansion machines are going to be iMac's, connecting to the SAN via AFP.
We work mostly at uncompressed 10-bit for finish, pro-res occasionally for offline. We are not interested in FCServer for it's proxy generation, we don't want to flood our SAN with compressed files, we'd run out of space.
With that in mind... in your humble opinion, do we need FCServer?
Also, keep in mind, it would have to run on our metaSAN master XServe. I am concerned about the compatibility of this setup, although Tiger Tech says it's supported.
Would this give producers access to browsing assets if they are not on a FCP machine?
Any other helpful advice?
Thanks in advance for your time.
2 x 3.2 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon 8 GB 800 MHz, Mac OS X (10.6.4), metaSAN, Sonnet RX1600s, Kona 3, FCP 7 suite v.7.0.3
Posted on Nov 18, 2010 6:51 AM