Petersa,
Welcome to Aperture. Transitioning from iPhoto to Aperture can be a surprising event to some if you don't know what to expect. There must be a reason for your recent decision to start using Aperture. Hopefully it is that you want to take a giant step in what you can do with your images. This goes well beyond image organization, but since this is your primary question, why don't we stick with that.
The first thing I would recommend is that you take a serious look at reconsidering how your image library is organized. Do not sell yourself short by sticking to the conventions that iPhoto allows in its organizational structuring. Aperture is so much more powerful than iPhoto on every level, and this extends into its organizing and filtering powers. You are going to want to take advantage of these amazing features.
That said, I would take a serious look at the way you were organizing your images and seriously consider starting fresh with a brand new structure that you can customize to fit your needs with amazing accuracy and clarity.
First, a few basics:
Aperture has a few basic containers that hold images. Projects, Folders, Albums and Smart Albums.
Lets start with Projects. These are akin to what iPhoto calls Events. For the most part, all of your image masters will be stored in a Project. You can create as many, or as few as you like. I would recommend creating a new project for every different event or photo shoot. More on Projects in a bit.
Folders are places to store other things. You can store projects, albums and smart albums in folders, but you can also place folders in projects as well. Folders are a great tool to use to create a nested organizational system. More on Folders in a bit too after we talk about albums.
Albums are a way of sub-categorizing and separating certain images out of projects so that you can isolate them. Think of them as photo albums that you keep on your shelf. You can place as many, or as few images as you like in them. You can place images from the same project, or from different projects into the same album. They don't actually contain the master images. They simply contain a reference to that master image called a version. Albums can be regular albums that you add things to manually, or smart albums that hold items that meet a certain criteria that you choose. Think of them the same way that you would think of albums and smart albums in iTunes.
Getting back to your issue, it is hard to determine what exactly took place on your import into Aperture. If you are going to use Aperture at all, you should really make it your primary application, using iPhoto as your secondary application, if at all. There really is very little point using both, and using it in the way that you are using it, is like having both a Kia and a Mercedes and driving the Kia, while keeping the Mercedes in the garage. Use your top of the line program.
If I were you, I would forget transferring your photos to Aperture in the way you went about it. I would locate your master images (by either exporting them to your HD or external HD, or by finding them wherever they might reside) and doing a straight import of your master images into Aperture as either a Managed Master Library, or as a Referenced Master Library.
A managed library simply means that all of your photos are kept neatly in a packaged folder called the Aperture Library. This folder will also contain all of your metadata, edits, thumbnails, etc. Aperture manages this folder, so while you can have access to it, you generally don't need to ever go in there. A referenced library means that you keep your master images where they are, and Aperture simply references them in there current location.
Deciding on which way to go is purely up to you, and you can't go wrong with either, nor can you make a mistake. If you decide that one isn't for you later on, Aperture makes it very easy to switch from a managed library to a referenced library and vice versa as many times as you like.
Getting back to projects, folders and albums, there is really no right or wrong way to go about organizing them. It is best to pick some type of organizational structure from the start that you are comfortable with so that you don't have to do a lot of rearranging later, but even if you do, it is not big deal. Aperture takes the hard work out of almost everything for you.
petersa wrote:
I'm new to Aperture and just finished importing my iPhoto library via selecting import iPhoto library to Aperture library. My desire was to have the same library that was organized in iPhoto only in Aperture. When I go to iPhoto library and right click I have all my photos organized in year folders and then in date folders. Unfortunately when I go into Aperture and do the same thing, I end up with one year with multiple layers of folders that don't seem to reference anything and then end up with my events individualized in folders under about 12 layers of folders? Is this normal, did I miss selecting something in the import. I've read something about metadata and how to organize into year month project etc. Will this also rearrange the folders in the file?
I'm not exactly sure what is taking place here, because it should essentially create the same folders that you had in iPhoto. A screenshot would be handy to see exactly what you mean. Aperture is not going to create a folder automatically based on the year, month, etc. You can certainly go about organizing your images that way if you like and you can do it pretty quickly. In Aperture, images are stored in Projects. At some level, you will need to have projects, so it is not going to be a matter of having a hierarchy of folders. You can filter down your library in Aperture by clicking on photos in the library pane of the inspector and creating a filter by capture year. Once you have all of the photos in the year, say 2007, you can highlight them all and then click, "New" "Project" and have all of those images moved into a new project that you name 2007. Again, moving forward, it is all going to depend on how you want to organize your images, and Aperture gives you so many more great options than just calling your projects and folders a year and a day. You don't really need to do this because you can easily create albums and smart albums to do this for you. I think you will be selling yourself short by going with this system, but that is just my humble opinion.
I would really like to help you get organized in any way that you want, so perhaps we can continue this discussion after you read this and get back to me. For now, I hope I haven't confused you too much.
Mac