That's a bit trite.
Your terminology is mixed up btw:
Sata II = Sata 3gb/s
Sata III = Sata 6gb/s
The sata ports themselves aren't faulty, the Sata II controller is. Any Sata II port using that chipset is subject to failure.
The "fixed" chipsets haven't shipped yet. The risk calculation companies are using here is that the failure is ~3 years out. It's caused by a capacitor leak which grows over time and eventually fries the controller. Potential for failure increases through usage, so YMMV.
Relevant information:
1.Port 0 on the new MBP is the only Sata III, the rest of them are Sata II (including the port the superdrive is on). The hard drive occupies port 0
2.The fixed chipsets haven't shipped yet, so your Option 1 isn't possible
Their real options:
1. Ship now and allow service recalls in the future if/when failures begin happening, since 2-3 years from now no one will remember this recall from Intel if they knew about it in the first place.
2. Wait and ship the new MBPs a few weeks late, hurting the stock price.
It's pretty obvious if you do a little research that they went with option 1.
Reference board implementation:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4142/intel-discovers-bug-in-6series-chipset-begins -recall
New MBP Port 1
http://grab.by/grabs/1b8a0907f3fc1406b02ffe32c20c52fa.png
The "Ports 0 and 1 are fine" misconception comes from the Intel 6 Series Reference desktop board, which has Sata III on ports 0 and 1. The problem won't be fixed until the new chipsets ship
The hard drive on the new MBP will be fine, but the super drive is on a defective port.
Message was edited by: KKitty