fatcat585 wrote:
Matt Larson2 wrote:
I'm not too concerned with the video quality. I don't expect it to be as good as HD cable because it's streaming video and a different technology than cable. For me it's much bbetter than SD, and about as good as hD so I'm content.
Plus I think my cable company would cut me off if I was downloading 15
Mb for 4 hours/day 5 days/week!
...would you also be as content and accepting of that as you are of MLB.com not being able to provide what they advertise as "HD quality"?
i for one am not nor would not, as are many other people here. i expect what is advertised to me and i subsequently pay for...
I would have to say that MLB made a mistake in advertising this product as "HD quality". They should have said "near" HD quality. For the most part, I find the picture to be very close to HD with occasionally some blurring which quickly snaps back to a sharp picture.
Would I accept this quality of service from DTV? NO, I wouldn't. However, since this service is streaming, I can accept it. My wife's son has FIOS TV and I personally think it ***** the few times I've seen it. Annoying intermittent pixilation in parts of the screen. This is another streaming service.
I watched the Red Socks/Yankee game yesterday and it was fine. However at about the 55 minute mark, the screen froze for about 3 seconds and then quickly snapped back to the action. That was the only time it happened while I was watching. That is not to say it might have happened again during a bathroom break.