Double NAT in a hotel room - missing the point here
Hi there,
I've read through many discussions on the topic, and I really do seem to be missing the point of the answers given in those discussions so maybe you can help me.
I travel with a travel router so that I can take 1 hotel room WIRED connection and turn it into multiple wireless connections. I obviously just want my router to be the only device on the hotel room network.
I use NAT mode in a hotel I am in with my Airport Express and I see Double NAT. This has the appearance of working OK, except:
-Mail on any iOS device will not fetch mail (connection to server failed)
-Intermittent DNS issues
-Dropbox connections on Mac or iOS will not work: Dropbox believes the connection is not secure
-Many more issues that do not make Double NAT error mode a viable connection
Well, OK. So many people seem to suggest (I don't know why) that some router on the hotel's network may be preventing other routers. This sounds absurd, but OK. I tried the same hotel room connection with a $20 router from China, an Asus WL-530g. The ASUS in its NAT mode takes up 1 IP on the hotel WIRED network and provides multiple wireless IPs. And:
-There are zero connectivity issues
What exactly is the Airport express missing?
I am able to get NAT working with a Linksys router, a Cisco router, and a second Linksys router - all brought by my coworkers.
"Distribute a range of IP addresses" options just seems to pull all the wireless devices to the hotel network directly - this means every device will now get charged.
Bridge mode has nothing to do with NAT and just puts all devices on the hotel network again.
Am I missing something? This is a $99 travel router, and it can't seem to perform the most used function one would have in a travel router - routing IP addresses while travelling. Is there a reason the alternate suggestions I have listed are offered as viable solutions?
Airport Express-OTHER, Mac OS X (10.6.7)