Cosman wrote:
Jerry,
(1) When I posted the two screen shots, I stated that the cursor did not show up in the pictures. Then I told where each cursor was. It was in different indentations. The ruler bar showed exactly the same in both cases, unless I am blind.
(2) In the case of Koenig, he copied my discussion text and put it into Pages and showed how the indentation is supposed to work, rulers and all. His demostration is correct. Except is doesn't apply to my problem. On MY computer, apparently the styles were different underneath and the differences were invisible. The styles menus showed the same thing no matter where I clicked. His computer was not set up like mine.
(3) I made some dedicated styles with single button hot keys, so I know exactly what is in them. They are accessible 3x faster than fiddling with multiple menus by a simple keystroke.
(4) My comments about the lousy interface still stand. I have a quick example to illustrate what I mean. Some of the first level menus on the screen make no sense. Why are there two menus with exactly the same icon (the paragraph icon) on the left, with entirely different meanings. Front line menus are buried two or three deep. I don't remember ever using opacity, shadow, and reflection. Why are they taking up space on the main menu?
(5) The poster boys for me are the old Word menus and the current OO.org menus. I don't care if they are "pretty" or not, I want to see then major menu items ones and go to them immediately. I also don't want any hidden gotchas, which is the origin of this discussion. I like the menu in open office the best. They didn't screw up like MS with floating ribbons that are always in the way.
(1) As I already wrote, the cursor is perfectly visible in one of your screenshots so it seems that it would be useful to consult an ophthalmologist.
(2) Look at what I uploaded on my iDisk. What I got is what you got !
(3) I didn't asked you to navigate in several menus but to click buttons (the alternate scheme thru menu has built in shortcuts)
(4) Your example really tell us that you need an ophtalmo consultation.
One ¶ is in a blue circular button which opens the named_styles pane.
The other one is in a grey popup menu which give us access to a subset of the named_styles which is interesting when we have no space available for the full pane.
(5) Perfect example of someone which feel that every app must behave as the one which he is accustomed to work. Apple never defined Pages as a clone of Word and never defined it as a Word competitor. It's just an app designed for the normal beings, not for the Pro of Word Processing.
It's clearly explained in :
++-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-++
Apple Human Interface Guidelines:
Apply the 80 Percent Solution
During the design process, if you discover problems with your product design, you might consider applying the 80 percent solution‚ that is, designing your software to meet the needs of at least 80 percent of your users. This type of design typically favors simpler, more elegant approaches to problems.
If you try to design for the 20 percent of your target audience who are power users, your design may not be usable by the other 80 percent of users. Even though that smaller group of power users is likely to have good ideas for features, the majority of your user base may not think in the same way. Involving a broad range of users in your design process can help you find the 80 percent solution.
++-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-++
You defined at least seven combinations of tabs stops in your example so, it's not surprising that you have seven different behaviors.
Yvan KOENIG (VALLAURIS, France) vendredi 20 mai 2011 12:01:00
Please :
Search for questions similar to your own before submitting them to the community
To be the AW6 successor, iWork MUST integrate a TRUE DB, not a list organizer !