nicoladie wrote:
I'm not talking about the cookies deposited by the search engine. I am talking about the cookies deposited by the websites you surf. When you use ixquick's proxy to surf any website, none of the cookies in those surfed websites will be deposited in your computer. The proxy traps them.
All those 100s of unwanted cookies are deposited by the websites you surfed or pre-fetched by the browser. The cookies of the search engine is only 1 out of 100s of unwanted ones.
Ixquick is a meta-search engine. It uses a voting system to aggregate the search results, which means the search results are statistically significant, with consensus among search engines.
This means it eliminates any bias and skewing of the search result by any search engine, or any tricks the website used to artificially jack up their search rank. It gives much more reliable search results because meta-search result is, by definition, is independent of the specific search algorithm because the search result is voted on by multiple search algorithms.
I'm sorry, but you don't understand how this works (asides from this being off topic). What Ixquick does is take the top 10 results from several major search engines (google, yahoo, etc) and the results that are most common to these are displayed. If the top 10 results in google, and yahoo etc. are sensationalist garbage, guess what? You get garbage results--the most common garbage between them. Google, Yahoo and others display results they think you are most likely to click, not results most related to what you actually searched for--and their results are becoming very similar. There are many sites like ixquick that do this, which all suffer the same problem. The difference with duckduckgo is it's trying to find resuts that are most related to what you searched for.
For example, try searching for "budget of Iceland" in the major search engines or ixquick. You'll notice the results are roughly the same, all trying to sell you a flight there or other travel related stuff (top link on ixquick is for Icelandair). Then try duckduck, and you'll see the first link of duckduck is actually about the budget of Iceland.
As for cookies on websites we go to, that is the point of this thread, having Safari respect the choice not to accept cookies--which it largely does with version 5.1.4.