upeace

Q: Can't connect via SMB

Prior to installing Lion, I would connect to our shared drives at work via SMB.  Today, after installing Lion, I can't connect to my shared drives.  The one SMB connection that works is to an FTP server.  I connect via SMB to map the drive in my Finder rather than using an FTP program.  This still works fine.

 

However, I can't connect to the shared drive for file sharing.  In the Connect to Server box, I have "smb://PathToFiles" .  Is smb://  the correct prefix to use now that Lion is funky with SMB support?

 

I'm sorry...I really don't know much about SMB connections, what kind of server it is that I'm trying to connect to, or much else.  I know we run Windows Exchange, but I'm not sure if that's the server that hosts these shared drives...I just need to connect to get back to work.  Any help would be AWESOME.

Posted on Jul 21, 2011 1:55 PM

Close

Q: Can't connect via SMB

  • All replies
  • Helpful answers

first Previous Page 7 of 9 last Next
  • by elpietri,

    elpietri elpietri Feb 1, 2012 12:16 PM in response to LostLib
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Feb 1, 2012 12:16 PM in response to LostLib

    Oops! With all the exitement I didn't have a chance to read through all the 86 posts.  Very weird; after logging out the clients and logging them back in, the Mac server is gone from the Windows PC's.  I reverted the changes and now everything is working fine on all PC's.  I hope that tomorrow everything still works.  I'm almost convinced that there is a Gremlin inside my network.

  • by Jobster,

    Jobster Jobster Feb 1, 2012 2:21 PM in response to elpietri
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Feb 1, 2012 2:21 PM in response to elpietri

    10.7.3 update now available. Promises that windows file sharing is resolved.........

  • by gsryu,

    gsryu gsryu Feb 1, 2012 4:04 PM in response to Jobster
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Feb 1, 2012 4:04 PM in response to Jobster

    But. It's not resolved.. OMG

  • by elpietri,

    elpietri elpietri Feb 1, 2012 5:15 PM in response to gsryu
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Feb 1, 2012 5:15 PM in response to gsryu

    My Gremlin has not surfaced yet.  It's been 8 hours and all my Win 7 Pro and XP Pro machines can see and access my Mac Mini Server.  I upgraded to 10.7.3 and still works.  I'll keep my fingers crossed.  We'll see if the Gremlin re-surfaces overnight.

  • by gsryu,

    gsryu gsryu Feb 1, 2012 5:23 PM in response to elpietri
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Feb 1, 2012 5:23 PM in response to elpietri

    In my case. Connect to NAS SMB.

    In these days. It looks like NAS vendors might provides Firmware fix.

    My NAS vendor stop update since last Jan.

  • by Narvistus,

    Narvistus Narvistus Feb 1, 2012 10:41 PM in response to kkausu
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Feb 1, 2012 10:41 PM in response to kkausu

    kkausu,

     

    About those folder rights on 2008 R2 server. Noticed few days ago, that OS X with VPN connection doesn't understand Bypass Traverse Checking (on by default on 2008). That caused some problems for us.

     

    In short what it mean:

    There's a shared folder in \\server\share. Users don't have any right for the share folder itself, just for some subfolders there. For example \\server\share\user. Bypass Traverse Checking on 2008 allows users to access user folder, even though they don't have any right on the share folder.

     

    Now that OS X has problems with Bypass Traverse Checking, Finder reports that user cannot connect to \\server\share\user as there are no permissions. Setting Traverse Folder / Execute file rights to users fixes this, as it allows people with OS X to do what they're supposed to be allowed already.

     

    As for removing the Traverse Folder / Execute file rights on users, it's quite pointless, unless there's some modifications for local security policies (see http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc739389(WS.10).aspx). Traverse Folder / Execute files doesn't actually let people to "see" those folders, it just allows them to move past them to some subfolder they have rights to. Meaning connecting to \\server\share doesn't show them anything (probably doesn't even allow them to connect), but it let's them to connect \\server\share\user if they have rights to it.

     

    Hope this helps someone someday, atleast it fixed some problems here. Even though I'd really like to see working the way it was intended

  • by aPEXMac,

    aPEXMac aPEXMac Feb 2, 2012 12:08 PM in response to upeace
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Feb 2, 2012 12:08 PM in response to upeace

    The connection with my Amiga is also no more working.

     

    I am using Samba 2.2.5 und with Snow it was working fine. With Lion 10.7.3 I can see the Amiga in the finder, but if I try to connect, I get the message that this server version is not supported.

     

     

    Only using Midnight Commander, I am able to connect and to exchange files!

  • by Bart Pfeffer,

    Bart Pfeffer Bart Pfeffer Feb 3, 2012 7:31 AM in response to Jobster
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Feb 3, 2012 7:31 AM in response to Jobster

    SMB issues are NOT resolved with 10.7.3, it's better but still not there.  I removed Samba and MacPorts and reconfigured my system to use the native SMB implementation in 10.7.3.  Good news is that I can now see and connect to my main Mac system from my Windows 7 systems.  The issues I am still having:

     

    Seems that I have to remove and re-add the users to the SMB panel after each reboot before the connections work.

    Streaming large video files is not working.  They start to stream but within a few minutes they lock up.

     

    Going back to Samba 3 again for now...

  • by john-mac,

    john-mac john-mac Feb 3, 2012 10:01 AM in response to Bart Pfeffer
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Feb 3, 2012 10:01 AM in response to Bart Pfeffer

    I have just updated to 10.7.3 and the windows 2008 r2 server is now working by smb. Also smb seams quicker to connect when connecting to shares (that worked before).

  • by LostLib,

    LostLib LostLib Feb 3, 2012 1:57 PM in response to Bart Pfeffer
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Feb 3, 2012 1:57 PM in response to Bart Pfeffer

    "Seems that I have to remove and re-add the users to the SMB panel after each reboot before the connections work."

     

    I think this is related to the race condition I outlined a couple of months ago, in which the authentication services come up after the SMB service, but there is no dependency or wait implemented by Apple.

     

    If connecting Win7 --> OSx and you can turn off the service and turn it on a minute after reboot and it works, then that is the problem. I scripted the stuff below and stuck it in the startup flow. Reference my previous post on in this thread.

     

    sleep 60

    sudo serveradmin stop smb

    sleep 5

    sudo serveradmin start smb

  • by Uncle Davy,

    Uncle Davy Uncle Davy Feb 20, 2012 3:49 PM in response to upeace
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Feb 20, 2012 3:49 PM in response to upeace

    I am a network administrator and I found 1 workaroud so far... 

     

    Scenario:  Unbound Lion Machine needs access to Windows 2008 Domain shares

     

    If you just use smb://server/share it WILL work.  You will see the authentication box, enter your Windows User Name and password.  And a mere 15 minutes later the share WILL open.

     

    If you think that is too much of a lag you can:

    Create a user profile that uses the windows user name and password.  It all works like magic.  Just like it should.  Shares mount on boot and everything.

     

    Doesn't work so well, if like me you connect to shares on 10 or 12 networks.

     

    The issue I have seen is that Lion is passing the local user name and password to Windows and it waits and waits.  After a while it actually passes the credentials you entered.

     

    I hope this helps someone somewhere.

     

    I hope Apple fixes this problem because I can't upgrade until they do.

  • by aPEXMac,

    aPEXMac aPEXMac Feb 21, 2012 4:21 AM in response to upeace
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Feb 21, 2012 4:21 AM in response to upeace

    No, it is not working here. The server can be found, but a requester says it is too old to allow a connection.

    Stupid ****, I do not like the way Apple is moving. :-(

  • by Eduardo Gutierrez De O.,

    Eduardo Gutierrez De O. Eduardo Gutierrez De O. Feb 24, 2012 4:11 AM in response to aPEXMac
    Level 1 (9 points)
    Feb 24, 2012 4:11 AM in response to aPEXMac

    You should. The switch in Lion is finally forcing dozens of manufacturers to move their behinds and update what's now a two-decades old protocol famous for being the slowest and least secure out there.

     

    Boxee, for example, now supports Lion's SMB implementation. Tons of others are doing the same and Samba itself has also switched gears to ensure their implementation is up to par.

     

    Let's not forget Apple is implementing what's been the official version of the SMB protocol for years, which is also publicly available. And what Samba used to provide was an older, inefficient, hacked-together, reverse-engineered version of two dozen protocols collectively called "SMB/CIFS".

     

    So, you probably shouldn't like that Apple has forced people to do this, but the update itself is a GOOD thing. It's a bit like when the iMacs only came with USB. It was a burden but it was GOOD for everyone (not just Macs or Mac Users).

     

    There will be glitches, because not all services have upgraded yet and because it's a new implementation. But the fact that it's done on a documented protocol instead of the spaghetti that is Samba is a good thing.

  • by rayray519,

    rayray519 rayray519 Feb 24, 2012 2:31 PM in response to hotrodmacman
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Feb 24, 2012 2:31 PM in response to hotrodmacman

    Whats the easiest way to edit this, and will this also work for the client version of Lion?

    Thanks.

  • by applesuper,

    applesuper applesuper Feb 24, 2012 2:56 PM in response to Eduardo Gutierrez De O.
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Feb 24, 2012 2:56 PM in response to Eduardo Gutierrez De O.

    While they force others to force their behinds can they force their behinds to ensure their users reliably connect and search network drives? That would be much appreciated...

first Previous Page 7 of 9 last Next