Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

Bring back old working Spaces and Expose

Mission Control is a complete misfire and several steps backwards in design and usability. They took something that was beautifully simple and nearly flawless and turned it into a chaotic mess for no reason.


I was a heavy user of Spaces and Expose and it was easily my favorite OS X feature hands down. Now it's been three days of Lion and I just avoid Mission Control at all costs and find myself switching apps instead, something I would expect from Microsoft, not Apple.


Trying to understand how to use MC without going insane I started simply swithing apps instead of thinking about spaces, and at least that made some sense, but there was still a lot of unnecessary changing of spaces back and forth for no reason. It dawned on me to try something: I killed all Spaces and have a single desktop with every window. You know, like Windows would do. As a testament of what a terrible idea MC is, it works a lot better this way. When you do Expose you can at least understand what you're looking at, and you don't care that the tiny Space thumbnail is being covered up by your windows. There's also no unnecessary shuffling between spaces. It's an obviously cluttered, primitive, step back in sophistication and usability that almost makes me wish I had Vista's Flip 3D, but at least I am not spending half of my time jumping between spaces and hunting down lost windows.


Here's some of the issues with Mission Control:


- It's visually confusing and messy. The application windows usually cover the Spaces thumbnails along the top. What is the point of showing me the Spaces if they're covered up with windows? Isn't that defeating the very point of Mission Control? Why do I need to see my desktop background inset within *another* background in MC? Why are the Windows stacked so tightly and messily? It's impossible to pick the window you want unless you do "App Expose". What is the point of having Spaces previews if they're so tiny you can barely see what it's in them anyway? They used to be nice, clean, large previews. Now it's a stupid mess of tiny thumbnails with drop shadows, text labels, multiple backgrounds, being covered by app windows... ugh.


- The fact that they are now a linear row of spaces along the top is clearly much less user friendly than the old grid method, which was spatially and visualy easy to use and memorize. Now I have to think about numbers for desktops instead of "up" or "down". You know how much easier it is to type numbers on a keypad versus pecking the linear numbers along the top of your keyboard? Same thing. Also, you could go into the old Spaces and accurately hit the Space you want to go to because they were huge, easy to read and remember targets. Now they're tiny, hard to remember and usually hidden under something else.


- It took the advantages of both Spaces and Expose and eliminated them in order to merge them, who knows why. You used to be able to go into Spaces, and then Expose while there to reveal every window, and find *any* open window in seconds. Now it's impossible. You have to shuffle haplessly through spaces and hit expose and hope the window you're looking for shows up, and if that fails, which happens often, then you have to switch to every application and hit app expose. What a mess.


Easy solution: Just bring back the old Spaces and Expose, maybe as an option to MC. Or at least give us the option fo a grid layout and old style Expose. Please. Please. Please.

Mac OS X (10.6.7)

Posted on Jul 23, 2011 12:49 AM

Reply
380 replies

Jul 7, 2013 1:50 PM in response to TomDSchneider

TomDSchneider wrote:


I did not think to do that particular google search.



Why would I not be surprised, as you were needing to Google expose and....um....mountain lion.


The second link gives a video which demonstrates what the new Expose does. It does not tile the windows over the entire screen. So if I have 16 terminals and web pages up, they will be smaller than they could be. This is therefore still a failure by Apple.

Then you are doing it wrong or have never used Expose properly.


http://www.extensions.in.th/amitiae/08_2012_2/mission.html


Cheers


Pete

Jun 3, 2014 11:47 AM in response to artnative

artnative wrote:


The Episode continues ... "Back to the future ... IV"


I would guess that like you and me the simple reason anybody would read this thread is because they are not happy with the utterly awful Mission Control. Only somebody with nothing better to do would actually bother responding to the thread given it's simple to understand title.


Apple boasted yesterday at the WWDC that in the last 12 months 130 million customers bought an Apple product for the first time. All of Apple's new customers over the last few years won't even know about Spaces and Expose and that is part of the problem because they will simply tolerate Mission Control.

Jun 4, 2014 12:35 AM in response to petermac87

Why have parents (hardware and software) developers invented super large 27" screens that are not being used efficiently and productively?


I have a super large 27" screen (percentage of large screen sizes are increasing)


1) The only thing I see are super small(!) thumbnail views of my spaces that are hardly to recognize

2) I am no longer able to simply drag and drop one application or finder window from one space into another with one click

3) Easy and quick drag & drop technology was an essential technology invented by Apple

4) I need to move my mouse to the top right corner to "discover" a plus icon to create a new space

5) New spaces are only visible in small sizes in a horizontally aligned position

6) I am no longer able to create rows and cols to organize my own productivity environment

7) I need to switch between spaces to make changes

8) I have no longer a large scaled view of all of my spaces I have created so far

9) I use hot corners to quickly and easily access and switch between spaces as fast and quickly as ever possible


And ... waht is your "Pro/Contra" argument?


Summary: The more spaces I create, the smaller the thumbnail views become ... but that's my understanding of user interface design instead of being able to change the desktop background for each space.

Jun 4, 2014 5:46 AM in response to petermac87

petermac87. Why are you here if you have no argument and nothing to add. The thread is for individuals that would like Spaces and Expose returned. It is not for enthusiasts of Mission Control. Is that so tricky to understand.


artnative. TotalSpaces still works for me as a viable alternative but I would prefer not to have to use a third party application.

Jun 4, 2014 11:59 AM in response to petermac87

petermac87 wrote:


I was not replying to you. Please read the posts properly.


Pete


And exactly where did I suggest that you were replying to me?


Please read the post properly. In fact please read the title of the thread properly. Your participation since day one has been tiresome to say the very least. I just fail to understand what your motives are. I fully accept that some people may just prefer Mission Control especially if they are casual users. Is it really so difficult for you to appreciate that there are a lot of people who are not happy about losing Spaces and Expose. 40000 is a meaningful number of clicks on a thread even if you are personally responsible for far too many of them !!


Cheerio !!

Bring back old working Spaces and Expose

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.