And is providing the above information more appropriate?
As far as guiding the OP to solve his problem? yes... certainly when taken in context with the rest of the post. I explained why I think his original command failed, provided pointers for more likely options.
Are you sure that the command above will properly install the software?
Am I sure? no, but I included a caveat that I "...expect this to have more chance of success". There are no guarantees since it depends on details that I'm not privvy to, including the actual location of the package itself. Hopefully the rest of the details in my post give sufficient direction.
Are you sure it won't delete vital portions of the OS and/or other applications?
Unlikely. As much as you and I don't like Symantec I doubt their installers are going to do something that draconian. That would put a really big egg over Symantec's face, especially in the enterprise market which is who they cater to.
Granted, it will likely work fine, but I have more confidence in double-clicking it in the Finder
I do prefer the Finder, too. The GUI installer is far preferable for most users, however the OP stated that he was trying to create a silent (presumably headless/unattended) install and that precudes the use of the GUI installer which requires numerous clicks and keyboard input from the user.
At the end of the day, Apple provide a command-line interface to the package installer because it's more convenient in some cases, especially for admins coming from other UNIX/Linux environments. There's nothing wrong with guiding a user through the idosyncrasies of Apple's installer syntax/command line switches.