ricky_tang wrote:
Now you're entering the world of crazy talk. I say I'm getting similar usage time from my iP4S compared to my old iP4 and you asked me to prove it. I post a comment from Anandtech, the site you keep quoting, and you decide to change the subject and focus only on 3D usage time and standby time. Anandtech stated that depending on you usage, battery life may be better, the same, or worse. Do you care to argue that?
I agree that if you remove your sim from your iP4S and use it to browse wifi side to side with your 4, you will get similar or better result on the 4S because the fact that it uses more power is upset by faster loading times. Out of the box though, for the reasons explained in the last 700 pages, this will simply not happen. Most people here know that they've had to tailor many settings on their phone to reach similar usage to what they had on the 4 - that is if they don't have other issues.
To reach the advertised standby time I would to not use my phone for days. I'd guess that everyone here that actually owns and uses a smartphone, unlike you, will actually use the phone and will never be able to reach the advertised standby time. We can only extrapolate our standby battery drain from a short period of time. My battery decreased from 100% to 98% in more than 7 hours last night. Do some simple math, probably difficult for you, and compute how much my standby time would be.
No one wants 6 days or whatever of standby looking at the phone. But 300 vs 200 means 0.33% per hour vs 0.5% per hour. When someone uses his phone a few hours a day, then wants to repeat the experience over a couple of days, then the difference will end up showing, or if someone wakes up on a saturday and spends half a day browsing and wants to make it through the day, such a difference will matter. If you're the type who extrapolates your standby time from a night of sleep without looking at the phones specs, without reading about the inaccuracy of the battery meter and how it will drain in a non linear fashion afterwards and the experience lots of people have had here with it, and you think you're getting less than 0.3% standby drain per hour, well you're dreaming of your old iP4. If you promote the iP4S based on your flaky extrapolation without understanding the concept of uncertainty, your belong with the marketing crowd, not with the "support engineers". Everyone here knows not to trust how the meter behaves from 100%.
As far as "engineers" are concerned, well this is only cultural. Where I come from, the term "engineer" is a reserved title (like MD etc.) and engineers are supervised by a professional corporation. To earn the title, you go to university for 4 years where you study chemistry, physics, maths, computer science, materials, geology, project management, hardware, technical design, drawing etc. There is a further specialization inside the program where you have tailored courses depending if you elect to become a - civil, computer, geology or electronics - engineer. So for me an MCSE is no engineer and in fact they don't have the right to call themselves "engineers" where I come from - certifcations or even a computer science bachelor doesn't make you an engineer here. The "engineers" where I come from rarely do support - they lead projects and design and implement solutions.
Now move on.