The question here is not about the superiority of Apple. I have had complaints with Apple dating back to the first Apple II clone that I built. Apple is a very innovative company but they still do not believe in open hardware or open software designs.
I own several Apples devices that are all managed by iTunes on my IBM COMPUTER. I can view any on my movies on any of my PCs (limit 5) using iTunes. I can view any of my movies on any of my Apple devices using the O/S built-in movie player. There is no need to install a special App. I can view any on my movies on any of my TVs using a video out connector or via Apple TV. This is the system that I bought in to. This was my choice, right or wrong.
The real question is who owns digital media (music, books, movies, etc.).
In the “old days”, you owned what you purchased. You were allowed to duplicate your 8-Tracks, Reel-to-Reels and LPs to cassettes because you already paid the royalties to the artist and this was considered to be “Fair Use” of the product. The greedy RIAA went crazy and tried to change the rules with advent of CDs and the open Red Book specification. In the end the consumer won. Still, why did I have to re-pay royalties to upgrade my LP collection to CDs?
The movie industry has always been a pain in the *** and their greed far surpasses that of the record industry. The movie industry never really complained about transferring laser discs to Beta Max or VHS. It was semi “Fair Use” for you to make backup of copies of your movies. The industry did make this difficult by playing games with the horizontal and vertical sync pulses but this could be corrected. The rules were changed with DVDs and companies like 123 Copy were shut down. It was ruled that you were not allowed to make backup copies of DVDs.
Now BLU Ray is here and so is the CLOSED HDMI specification. You want HD, then you have to kiss Hollywood’s *** and let them control your life. Ever wonder why you can not buy HD movies in iTunes unless WIN 7 installed; HDMI royalties. The XP machine that I built far surpassed the HDMI spec but I am not allowed to buy HD movies. This does not make me a Lemming as one fool would assert.
UltraViolet is another pieces of crap that has one purpose, and that is to shove DRM down our throats. Disney is planning to introduce their Keychest format. How nice!
The very name UltraViolet is misleading because it has no relationship to DVD wavelengths. It used to be called UltraViolet Copy, which is why there is so much confusion with Digital Copy. This is a marketing ploy, plain and simple. I had a long talk with the manager at Best Buy and MANY people have fallen into this trap.
Did you ever read the fine print on an UltraViolet package? The following comes off the cover of Dark Shadows:
“Ultraviolet serviced providers may charge for continued Cloud access”.
Do you understand what this means??? I have a serious problem with this statement and this does not make me a Lemming EL PAT0!
All of my iTunes movies are installed in a folder on my computer. In the event that my Apple device dies, then I can do a full restore of every movie that I own. I backup up all of my computer data every month and that backup is kept off site.
How do you backup the UltraViolet / Flixster movies from an Apple device?
There is NO reason that the Flixster APP needs to be installed on any Apple device. The required software is already present at the OS level. You may need Flixster for your Android but I do not need it nor do I want it. Moreover, I will not buy ANY movie that only provides UltaViolet. I will do without the move.
Having to rip a copy of newly released movie is not the solution. Jail-Breaking my iPad is not a solution. I did it already and there was no real advantage for me.
This is not a war of Apple Vs Android and it really has little to do with iTunes because you can buy direct from iTunes. It is a war on our rights as consumers. It is about who owns digital media. It is about copy write and “Fair Usage”. It is about the greed of the movie industry.
If I buy a digital movie, the format and the playback device are immaterial. If I buy an e-book, the format and the reader are immaterial. To be more specific, I should not have to pay double or triple royalties for something that I already own.
UltraViolet is a lease on digital movies not an ownership.