Compressor results after numerous tests and ????
Greetings.
I,ve spent the last two weeks working with just about every combination of Compressor settings and have decided that the best of my results were, to me, just acceptable.
My video is 30 minutes long expoted from FC as SCM, then on to compressor. Original camera footage HDV1080i/60, imported as pro res 422, full pro res work flow.
My first result was using the stock 90 min best quality, but that was pretty awfull, especial with type generated in FC, pxel-ly, jagged. I then ran several tests adjusting the encoder, adjusting frame rate (settled on 6.8 and 8.0 for those).
I used "better" as my all my other ssttings. Encoding times were about 4 hours.
I decided to try setting everything to "best" encoder still at 6.8 and 8.0 hit submit, and came back two and a half days later to the encoded files. FYI I set up a 4 core cluster in QMaster to speed things up on my eight core mac.
Of all the tests, best seemed to work best, but still not terrific. I realize that my original QT export of 27GB was now reduced to 1.6GB had lots to do with this.
My first question is there a way to fill a dvd-r disk with 4gb of info instead of it reducing it to 1.6? Seems like this would make a big difference.
Outside of that,are there companies specialize in taking an exported QT file and compressing it to your specs? Any idea what they charge?
If you need more info, let me know.
Thanks.
Jonathan
Mac Pro 2.4GHz 8 core, 8GB RAM, 5870, 24, Mac OS X (10.6.7), Matrox MXO Mini, LG internal Blu Ray burner