Thanks. I really appreciate the responses.
again, i think this is over my head to comprehend, sorry.😊
i skimmed Doug's, enough to beleive this is a very complex issue.
and as my understanding is superficial, i fear i will make a mess which can never be fixed if i used the wrong script to fix the wrong thing? could i be more vague? sorry for my ignorance. 😕
and now that i have 120GB of music files, i think it's just too late [way too cumbersome to clean up]
in essence, i wanted ONE folder per artist, with ONE folder per album. [and i guess just one folder per 'CD']
i now see that what is ideal for my needs is 'crude', but it works better for me than the highly refined tag system.... if Herbie does a Joni tribute, i don't want a separate folder for each song on the album, even though there are myriad artists on that album .... and now i understand that some people do.
i wish mac would give me a choice, a say in the matter. Dell was better at saying 'here's what we are going to do; if that's not ok with you, pick somethign else now'
If I understand msandrin's posts, my Music on my Dell [circa 2002! cannot recall what software, but not iTUNEs] was organized by the mp3 filename .... everything was where i expected it to be, organized by artist/albums/tunes ...... folders of 'unknowns' were a rare event; life was easy. simple. and it ws easy to make adjustments.
whereas now on the Mac things are organized based upon information in the ID3 tags [and that this info is not uniformly present, for reasons i cannot comprehend😕] and that on a Mac, tags trump filenames? but not always? still not clear on that.
somehow, when i ported over from the Dell to the Mac, mac rearranged everything and i had a big mess;
it seems that on the Dell, eg, i had one folder for the Beatles [or one for the carpenters] and within that folder a separate folder for each album, with all the tunes for that album within that folder. ah, the number of folders matched the number of physical CDs. comforting. but i may be wrong about this. seeing the past through rose colored glasses and all.
Now i have about seven folders for 'the Beatles' [but they all have different names and some are even album names; ditto carpenters] and each folder needs to be opened to figure out within which one of these a particular album of interest resides. far more folders than actual CDs. ugh. seriously?
to analogize, in my kitchen, i have objects related to 'baking' in say one cupboard and one drawer .... a quick glance into those two locations and i can instantly see the object i am looking for, even if i cannot recall it's name, or color, or precise shape. I know that out of say a possible 20 cupboards/drawers, i only need to rummage through 2 places and it will be where i last put it. Until i read this thread, it always felt that Mac was saying to me 'forget your system, we know better; we are just going to dump all your objects somewhere in that kitchen of yours and we will comingle baking and cooking and sewing supplies, and when you need an object, just tell us it's name and we will search for it for you [really reaally fast, much faster than Dell ever could, i have to admit] and spit it out on command.' well, the problem with that is that I don't always remember the name, and how am i to know if we are using the english spelling or German or Asian? i know, it depends upon in which era/reign the object was acquired. a whisk in one language is a broom in another!
similiarly, voice memos on my ipod, go somewhere on this mac [maybe first to itunes and then to hard drive? cna't figure it out], they receive some kind of label which may or may not be date related?, then i have to edit them in itunes to something meaningful, then figure out where they reside on the hard drive, go change those names to match up.... it's very confusing for me, this library database stuff. and when syncing happens, it's not crystal clear to me who's the master and who's the slave [or, do they change roles??? ]
on the dell, it was a manual drag and drop thing from one locus on mp3 player to one other location and there they stayed until I decided to put them elsewhere. sure. it was not super fast, but it was easy to comprehend. for me.
an automatic transmission is a great thing, dont get me wrong; but i sure miss my 1969 VW stick shift and double shifting in curves ...i always new what gear i was in and how much power i could count on ....with the Caddy, who knows? a false sense of control, I know, but...big sigh....
i no longer have the time/energy to fix this manually; and i'm not smart enough to figure out how to pre-test that the scripts are automatically doing what i would want.
anyways, thanks for helping me to slightly better understand why things are such a mess on my Mac. mystery solved. acceptance is surely around the bend.