Macbook Pro: Dual Core i7 vs. Quad Core i7 for iMovie

Hi-


Debating whether to purchase the 13" MBP 2.8 GHz dual-core i7, or whether to pony up $700 more for the 15" MBP 2.4 GHz quad-core i7. Another consideration would be whether to install 4 GB extra of RAM to get 8 GB at the cost of $180.


Critical question here is whether video editing in iMovie would be OK with the dual-core i7 plus the extra RAM, or whether the quad-core is really necessary. Anyone have some thoughts on this? Thanks in advance.

Posted on Dec 16, 2011 10:57 AM

Reply
8 replies

Dec 16, 2011 11:01 AM in response to Jason Habermeyer

The quad core is significant increase in computing power...video editing can be very cpu intensive. Also, more memory is a big help. You could consider the memory from a source such as OWC, www.macsales.com where you can get the 8GB fro something like $70, depending on current pricing. The have lifetime warranty and on-line videos to show you how.

Dec 16, 2011 11:33 AM in response to Jason Habermeyer

Jason, I really can't swear to iMovie only using 2 of four cores. Other regulars on here talk about how cpu intensive their video editing is so I would be inclined to go for the most cpu power first, memory second since you can always add memory yourself for a lot less money. But you cannot upgrade the cpu after purchase.


You might want to compare the tech specs on those two machines in more detail...bus speed, L2 memory, graphics units, to see what else you are getting for the additional cost...it is more than just the 2 vs 4 core cpu.


Then ask yourself for my work which will probably be the best route to take?

Dec 16, 2011 12:05 PM in response to Jason Habermeyer

Ralph has pointed you in the right direction regarding RAM. Both MBP'a will do the job, but I suspect the 15" machine will have the edge. That aside, another consideration is the screen size it self. Larger is better to put it simply. I have 17" MBPs for that purpose. That becomes a very big price jump, but I'm spoiled.


Another factor to consider in working with video, is storage. Video files can become very large. Think about external storage and data flow for various types of connections. Another advantage of the 17" MBP that it can accept and eSata connection (with an appropriate express card) where as the other MBPs cannot. esata is significantly faster than Firewire, which in turn is faster than USB. Naturally the enclosure will have to be eSata compatible. Faster yet will be the Thunderbolt connection, but as of now I am not aware of any compatible enclosures.


Ciao.

Dec 16, 2011 2:40 PM in response to Jason Habermeyer

You will want more than 8 GB RAM - I have 12 and am reasonably happy with the performance of my mid 2010 i3 although I wish it was faster. But, rendering takes time no matter what - a friend of mine at a major TV station told me that they run 6 or more computers at the same time to try to keep up with editing and rendering the stories coming in from field reporters. And I'm sure they'd have pretty good equipment as well as software. I'd go for the fastest processor you can afford, buy it with the standard RAM and add a minimum of 8 GB or 12 GB from OWC (macsales.com), and get the largest hard drive you can. As an example, I worked on a one hour video a while ago: during the process, with my creating/adding special effects, etc., the files in my project folder grew to about 300 GB total. And you need plenty of empty hard drive space to be working with the video as well. Also, don't forget an external drive to archive your files when done.

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Macbook Pro: Dual Core i7 vs. Quad Core i7 for iMovie

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.