Ah! But non-IT people will tell you that they prefer to simply plug their iPods into iTunes and let iTunes synchronize everything.
Synchronize =
- to make the same
- to match between two different locations
- to unify
So the data goes in both directions;
- iPod to iTunes - revised App data back up, play counts, last time played, revised rating, information about deletions on the iPod, new direct downloads on the iPod copied to iTunes,
- iTunes to iPod - new Apps copied to iPod, updated Apps replaced old ones on iPod and put your data into the updated version too, new audio and video copied to iPod, revised ratings info supplied to iPod
... but users do not need to know every little detail about what's going on or why. That's known as under-the-hood stuff. You, as an IT professional, may want to know all this, but the average Joe Public doesn't. They don't care. They wouldn't understand it and as a consequence they would be less likely to use an iPod.
Let's face it, who does Apple hope will buy iPods? Several thousand IT professionals or, millions of other people? Especially when you consider that an IT person becomes Joe Public when he walks into an art gallery.
None of us, either geeky or non-geeky need to know exactly the order of the sync process, only that it happens. Although if you watch the small yelllow window at the top of iTunes while Sync is in progress, you will see brief details of what is going on and when. The point you make about the order is very complex. To achieve "synchronization" between iTunes and the iPod, there needs to be consensus about which data takes priority over the other or whether they are equally important. Apple has done all that work for us. Wow! Thanks Apple, saves me time and leaves more of it to enjoy listenting to the msuic I've put on it.
For instance; I play a song on my iPod, and while it's playing, I change the rating from none to three stars. I also notice that the spelling of the album name is incorrect. So immediately before my next Sync, I correct the album name for that song - in iTunes - so that it matches the rest of the album (I have had to correct spelling in this way). At Sync, iTunes has to correctly "Synchronize" both the iPod and iTunes so that all the information that each has about the song is the same on both devices. And if I've played that song twice on my iPod, I expect iTunes to increase the Play count by two. (It does, I checked! 😁 )
But I don't want to muck about with all that FTP stuff, I don't want to know how iTunes works it all out, I simply want it to happen. And I've spent my entire career in IT and other technical roles.
Having used other media players, that do not have the benefit of a dedicated piece of software like iTunes to enable co-ordination between the computer with the music on it and the MP3 player, I can assure you that iTunes is a much better way of managing things.
Kythrash, try it this way:
Imagine that iTunes is the master version with everything in it. The iPod is simply a copy of what's in iTunes. (Because I've had iPods since before the Touch with it's Wi-Fi capabilities, I had to rely on iTunes as the "controller".) I do almost everything in iTunes and let the Sync make those changes onto the iPod. Then, when the iPod becomes corrupted, or when I replace my iPod, then all I need to do is plug the iPod into iTunes and let the Sync put my iTunes Library either, back onto the restored ipod or, onto the new iPod without any mucking about remembering what went where.
Yes, of course I make changes on my iPod. I even have to remember to do some things myself. But I still prefer the iTunes way of managing my iPod than all that FTP malarky.