Since Apple said that I was ranting I am going to try to re-post doing my own editing.
I had commented in the post removed by Apple that there are some people here who seem to post "their opinions" which seem to concentrate on minimizing our frustration. To me their opinion is irrelevant because I don't think any of them have experienced this incident and our frustration first hand. It doesn't take a genius to know and understand that batteries fail. We all know that batteries like anything else, have a life-cycle. Their postings pretend to be from subject matter experts point of view, who appear to have written the book on Li-Ion batteries technology. Therefore our frustrations are ridiculous. I wonder why their inflammatory posts are allowed to stay? One of them recently replied mockingly: "I bet you are now backing up the phone."
I ask you, how is this in any way constructive support advise? If it were once i can understand, but most of these comments have a very condescending tone which basically state the obvious but seem to be intended through sarcasm to make us feel like dummies.
I think, like many of you, after spending several thousands of dollars of my hard earned money on Apple products, I am entitled to express my frustrations on how i perceive Apple is mishandling this situation.
The points I made and which I think are shared by others who have had the same experience were:
- If the Li-Ion battery in the iPhone 3GS and any other IOS devices that have the "built-in" feature Apple says it designed into it, why didn't Apple state that clearly in the documentation that comes with the phones. In short, why didn't Apple let the customers know this upfront. They tell you after the fact like I am supposed to be keeping count of the number of "charging cycles". No regular average consumer knows or keeps track of that.
- If this built-in feature Apple claims these batteries have, was part of the product's design when it was conceived and they knew the battery would expand, causing the phone to pop open and essentially render it useless, why wouldn't they have also designed some type of indicator or warning on the screen letting the user know to "consider replacing the battery" like my Acer 5742 with a Li-Ion battery does. Which by the way, it hasn't exploded as some of these "troll" have indicated that any Li-Ion battery would.
- The retail price of the iPhone 3GS not subsidized was approximately $600 if you wanted to buy it from Apple off the shelf. You would think any reasonable thinking person would expect a device costing this much would last more than 3-5 years and have a useful life at least that long, right? So why on earth would Apple assume that those of us who have had this "unexpected" event would acquiesce with them and agree that 3 years is enough, and buy a new phone?
- If this was the case with the iPhone 3GS what about the other iPhones, iPads, iPods, etc. There are already documented same cases with iPhone 4 and some iPods. Do they have this build in feature as well where the device will explode, pop or expand as a result of a Li-Ion battery failure?
- The final point is that we know that this doesn't happen just to an Apple product, that is why we all believe in the quality Apple products have and I think honestly, we may have expected this from another company but not from Apple. So, we feel a huge let down, incredulous that a company with a reputation for quality, innovation and which has developed a "cult" following with customers so loyal that they forgo buying other manufacturers' products already out in the market and wait for Apple's version.
I believe there are significant examples here that indicate this is not a normal occurrence. I have a hard time believing Apple knew exactly that this battery would behave this way. If they did, they were negligent by not making the consumer aware.
I think they are trying to rely on the "goodwill" of the brand name that consumers have which i think is a horrible corporate strategy.
Hopefully somebody at Apple reads these posts comes to their senses and comes up with a strategy that is not as myopic as what they are using now in their next high level meeting.