Just to add to the confusion here, but I DO NOT ENTIRELY agree with anyone here about what "brand" of discs to use and whether other brands are "better" than others.
I use discs that Apple used to sell under their own brand, TDK, Sony and Memorex for years and I have never/EVER had any initial read/write errors or later read errors using these brands of discs.
I DO avoid any type of "off brand" name or "no name" generic type of discs that I do not recognize, though
What I really think DOES matter is the burn speed that the disk is burned at for the "best" and long lasting data that is recoded.
The slower the burning speed, the more permanent the data bits are "burned" into the disc's dye layer and the longer lasting the dye burn, that data will be retained longer on the disc over time. That is because the dye gets burned more permanently into the disc and it will take longer for that dye burn to fade away over time and, eventually, there will be a loss of data as an inability to read those dye burns over a certain passage of time.
So, if you want to burn a long lasting archive disc, it is best to burn the disc at a 1X or 2X speed to make a very dark burn impression into the dye layer of a disc.
If you are creating/burning a disc where longevity is less of an issue, then you can burn such a disc at a much higher burn/write speed where the dye burn will still be readable, but will not be as darkly burned and, therefore, will will fade out quicker in a lesser passage of time making the data on that kind of discs unreadable.
When I create archive discs that I know I won't change out for awhile, I burn these types of archive discs at 2X or 3X speed just to save a little time of writing to the disk than burning/writing the disc at 1X speed which would take many more hours to write to.
If I am burning/writing less important or less permanent data to disc and I am nor concerned about whether the disc will stay readable for a long time, I burn discs at much higher rates of burn/write speeds.