Apple Event: May 7th at 7 am PT

Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

Who still has the white Macbook 2,1 late 2006??

Hi all,

If you still have the white plastic Macbook 2,1 late 2006.....in working order........I am curious to know a few things, as I am in the process of doing a massive (for me) upgrade.

My specific model is the 2.0ghz 13" Core2Duo.

RAM has been upgraded to 4GB (though technically 3GB). I will be changing the HD to a bigger 7200rpm drive. Also, making the jump from Tiger to Snow Leopard (or maybe even Lion).

My Macbook is still in really good shape, so I would rather just spend $245 and upgrade a few things than junk it for a new one. Plus I don't have THAT kind of money right now.


My questions are:

Those who went with Lion, how did it work out? (what kind of work load are you putting it through?)

Anyone switch back to SL from Lion cause they hated it?? or too many problems??

Anyone love SL so much they wont touch Lion?

Those who have a 7200rpm hard drive, how is it?


And other bits you would like to add, that is specific to this model PLEASE DO!!

Thanks!

MacBook, Mac OS X (10.5.8), Macbook 2,1 Core2Duo 3GB RAM 2.0ghz

Posted on Apr 30, 2012 1:23 PM

Reply
34 replies

May 1, 2012 8:58 AM in response to Cattus Thraex

Cattus Thraex wrote:


I also have that machine and still is very good, including for Lion (late 2006, which was manufactured in 2007 too, supports and has 4 GB active RAM, 3 GB is for the mid-2006 series). Go for the upgrade, just note that the 7,200 rpm disk is a little bit noisier than the 5,400 disk.

Thanks, good to hear an other vote for Lion!

Yup, got the right size HD and all. TB is waaayyy to much for this thing (for me anyway) since it is up in the air if Mtn Lion will work with it. I would hate to spend money on TB's or SSD if Mtn Lion is not able to work with this Macbook.

Are you able to use the gesture features with Lion?

May 1, 2012 10:01 AM in response to Mini-Mac

Getting data remotely via Time Capsule requires

iCloud - which we can't smoke our way into without

Lion - which our 2,1's are a little too lean on memory

to handle with aplomb. In the present, large HDs

are available for a third of the price of TC and one

need leave nothing "on" at home to access. But I

agree that the cloud is the future, as is MobileMe

until June 30. I expect Mountain Lion to simplify

access to our data wherever it's stored. As you

may be one of the pioneers accessing TC remotely

we commend your spirit. You know how to recognize

the pioneers, I'm sure. They're the ones with the

arrows sticking out of their backs.

May 1, 2012 10:22 AM in response to AHMuse11

Tom Meade1 wrote:


You know how to recognize

the pioneers, I'm sure. They're the ones with the

arrows sticking out of their back.

Now now children, play nice.

Well Saturday is the big show down for me. I have the WD Scorpio Black 7200rpm with 250GB for my internal HD. Then the same one but 320GB for the external back up. I am doing all this with a help of a friend who knows Macs forwards and backwards. (Just in case something goes wrong.) He has Lion and thinks we should load it up just to see how it does. Everything will already be backed up, so I guess why the **** not?? I can always do a fresh install of SL if it ***** on my Macbook. Only issues that may come up is my Office for Mac is 2004, that wont work on Lion (more money). Also hopefuly my HD isn't too loud or vibrate too much. I have read a lot about that. Though it seems to be hit or miss as to how much noise or vibration.

May 1, 2012 12:27 PM in response to AHMuse11

I have to say I am quite effing excited! If it goes well....it will be like a new computer! To me anyway. Part of all this upgrading is because I can't get updates for anything anymore. Even Gmail had a pop up message saying "We are no longer supporting this version of Firefox. Some features may not work." My Hotmail said the same thing. Guess it was time if everyone is leaving me behind.

Thanks for all your thought guys!

Oct 8, 2012 1:55 PM in response to Mini-Mac

Realize this is a 6-month old thread, so apologies for raising the dead. But it's exactly what I'm looking at doing, so thought I'd check in with this group.


I'm upgrading my wife's late 2006 Macbook 2,1 to try to squeeze a few more years out of it. Just upgraded the RAM, and things already run better. Next is to install Snow Leopard or Lion, but I realize there's not enough space on the original 80GB drive. So an SSD upgrade is in order.


From what I read, this model Macbook has a SATA I connector which will work with SATA II drives, but not SATA III. Mini-Mac, you mentioned that you bought the Crucial m4, though, which (if my meager brain is understanding correctly) Is SATA III and supposedly shouldn't work. The Crucial site recommends the v4 instead of the m4 for this model.


So which is the right choice, SATA II v4 or SATA III m4?


Thanks!

Oct 8, 2012 9:56 PM in response to DangerSpork

If disk space is the most important detail, put a standard rotational disk. In my wife’s similar model I put a 7200 rpm disk (320 GB which, approx. 3 years ago, was the best choice price/capacity/quality). Another option is a hybrid (rotational + SSD disk, initially unreliable, now well done), SSD is of course faster and more expensive. SATA II and III have the same connectivity, but that generation of macs does not use the speed of 3rd generation SATA.

Therefore a 750 GB hybrid, with a 32 GB SSD, would be my choice, but opinions may vary, of course.

Oct 9, 2012 1:28 PM in response to Cattus Thraex

Thanks for the reply Cattus. Having enormous amounts of disk space isn't the most important aspect, nor is strictly cost per GB. For perhaps indefensible reasons, I'm sold on SSD for this upgrade.


It sounds like the Crucial m4 (SATA III) will work on the Macbook 2,1, but perhaps without the expected performance. Does anyone know if this will perform worse than a SATA II drive (like the Crucial v4)? Or would they be essentialy the same?

Oct 10, 2012 4:22 AM in response to DangerSpork

Only with pre-SATA III machines as their config does not yet know that there would be a SATA III era.

This is also a problem of pocket: an ATA hard disk is more expensive than a SATA disk, I have not analyzed prices regarding SATA II ~ III disks, if II is more expensive than III, then buy III, even if speed is not better with that generation of machine.

Feb 15, 2013 6:56 PM in response to AHMuse11

Mine has 2.5GB of RAM and SL. I found it was too slow with Lion when I installed that on an external FireWire drive and used it as a boot disk. My white MacBook is banged up - stress cracks on the case and everything but it still keeps on going, although the fan is on its way out again (second time).


5+ years old and it keeps on going.

Who still has the white Macbook 2,1 late 2006??

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.