Hi steph,
Syntax for ROUND is: =ROUND(number,decimal places)
number and decimal places are the two arguments used by ROUND. In the unction, the arguments are separated by a comma.
The original formula in G5 was this: =ROUND(SUMPRODUCT(B5:F5,$B$3:$F$3),2)
Comparing that with the syntax, you'll see these two arguments for ROUND, separated by a comma:
number: SUMPRODUCT(B5:F5,$B$3:$F$3)
decimal places: 2
When you edited this formula, you removed only the function name ROUND, leaving a set of parentheses containing two numbers—SUMPRODUCT(B5:F5,$B$3:$F$3) and 2—separated by a comma and enclosed by parentheses, but with NO instruction telling what to do with this pair of numbers. Numbers doesn't know what you want done with the numbers, do it sends an error message.
Your edit was intended to remove the ROUND function, leaving the unrounded result of SUMPRODUCT. To do that, you need to remove everything except the actual calculation of the number. Your edited formula should look like this in G5:
=SUMPRODUCT(B5:F5,$B$3:$F$3)
Note that column G in the template is formatted to show the result as a percentage, with no places after the decimal. If you want to show results to the nearer hundredth of a percent, you will need to edit the format, using the Inspector, to show two decimal places.
Perhaps a more significant question than "How" to show these results to the nearer hundredth of a percent is "Why" do you want to do this? Is 1/100 of one percent a meaningful amount?
What measurements of the students' work are you taking that you are confident you can distinguish 10000 degrees of achievement?
Here's a visualization to think about:
Consider 20 packages (reams) of paper for your school's photocopier, unwrapped and piled in a single, neat stack. For standard 20 pound bond copy paper, the stack, containing 10000 sheets, will be about a yard high. If the whole stack is considered as "100%", the each sheet of paper is 0.01% of the stack.
Richard Rock's final grade (on the template) is 82.45%, expressed to the nearest hundredth of a percent. How confident are you in the precision of that grade? For the stack of paper, the task to achieve that precision would be to insert a marker (eg. a letter opened or dinner knife) so that exactly 8245 sheets of paper were below the marker, and to do if by estimating or measuring (not counting) the position at which to insert the marker.
Is it possible? Certainly, given a precise enough and accurate enough instrument, and an operator skilled in using that instrument.
Is it repeatable? Probably. Sheets of paper tend to have a pretty consistent thickness, provided you don't change suppliers, finish, or weights, If an accurate measurement can be made to that precision today, then there's a good chance an equally accurate and precise measurement can be made using the stack of new paper available three months from now.
But does this accuracy and precision transfer to the task of measuring student achievement? And if it doesn't, does expressing grades to the nearest hundredth of one percent show a meaningful distinction?
Regards,
Barry