muhammadt wrote:
which macbook to buy is better refurbished or the not refurbished?
In the experience of my friends and I over the years, if you can get the Mac you want refurbished, you should get it refurbished. The reason is that you have the same warranty, but you save money, and no one I know has ever gotten a refurb with visible signs of use. Everyone I know has been happy with their Apple refurbs. My Mac Pro is refurb and 6 years later, it continues to thrive after other Macs have long gone out of service. My Time Capsule is a refurb and after four years it hasn't failed, even though Time Capsules are notorious for low reliability.
I have had new Macs that needed warranty service, and I've had refurbished Macs that never needed any service. I've had a new Mac that needed service and when I got it back it had dust under the screen, making it worse than a refurb. So why should I pay more money for absolutely no guarantee of extra reliability?
There is one situation where you must buy new, and that's where you need a custom configuration and you don't want to wait as long as it might take for that configuration to turn up in the Refurbished store, if it ever does.
One thing to keep in mind is that Apple's refurb program is much better than those of other companies. I would almost never buy refurbs from other companies. But Apple's have turned out to be a good deal over and over again.