wyljon
Level 1 (0 points)

Q: From a novice exporter!

I've edited family video shot from my Canon DSLR and want to export at high quality to keep long term on a hard-drive.  I optimised the video in Final Cut Pro X while editing.  What is the best way to export to keep best quality and reasonable export time?  Should I export as ProRes, as H.264, or uncompressed?  Is using a Quicktime movie best?  Thank you.

Compressor

Posted on Jun 2, 2012 6:07 AM

by Russ H,Solvedanswer
Russ H Russ H
Level 7 (21,890 points)
Quicktime
A:

Johnny,

 

Optimized media in FCP X parlance is Pro Res 422. Here is a very good article on Proxy versus Optimized.

If you were adding a lot of graphics to you movie, or if you were sending it to a professional for color grading, there might be a case made for PR HQ. But for most people, PR 422 is perfectly fine. BTW, Pro Res 444 is PR HQ with an alpha channel added (for transparency). 

 

Apple just out with somethirrg on native editing; notice that h.264 was not among those that will edit well. It will edit but it's easier in Pro Res…and it's my opinion that Pro Res treats graphics and text better. Whether it exports faster, I'm not sure. As I said I find exporting Pro Res to be rather painless,

 

Good luck.

 

Russ

Posted on Jun 2, 2012 3:53 PM

Close
wyljon

Q: From a novice exporter!

  • All replies
  • Helpful answers

  • by wyljon,

    wyljon wyljon Jun 2, 2012 6:12 AM in response to wyljon
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Jun 2, 2012 6:12 AM in response to wyljon

    I forgot to say, the video is 1080p, 24fps.

  • by Russ H,Helpful

    Russ H Russ H Jun 2, 2012 1:28 PM in response to wyljon
    Level 7 (21,890 points)
    Quicktime
    Jun 2, 2012 1:28 PM in response to wyljon

    If I were you I'd export Pro Res. If you want to work with the material in the future, it will stand up well under several generations of re-encoding. It's very close to lossless and is a fraction (maybe a quarter?) of the size of uncompressed.

     

    As far as export time is concerned, it should be fairly quick. I've found that FCP X exports even unrendered Pro Res sequences very fast…II almost never render anything unless it's an effect that won't play in real time.

     

    Best of luck.

     

    Russ

  • by wyljon,

    wyljon wyljon Jun 2, 2012 2:30 PM in response to Russ H
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Jun 2, 2012 2:30 PM in response to Russ H

    Thank you so much for your exporting advice Russ, and also about almost never rendering.

     

    When you speak of ProRes here, are you suggesting ProRes 422, 422 (HQ), or even 4444?  Would 422 be sufficent for my needs do you think?

     

    Also, should I always transcode my original clips to 'optimized media' in FCP X; does this speed up the editing and export?

     

    Thank you.

     

    Johnny

  • by Russ H,Solvedanswer

    Russ H Russ H Jun 2, 2012 3:53 PM in response to wyljon
    Level 7 (21,890 points)
    Quicktime
    Jun 2, 2012 3:53 PM in response to wyljon

    Johnny,

     

    Optimized media in FCP X parlance is Pro Res 422. Here is a very good article on Proxy versus Optimized.

    If you were adding a lot of graphics to you movie, or if you were sending it to a professional for color grading, there might be a case made for PR HQ. But for most people, PR 422 is perfectly fine. BTW, Pro Res 444 is PR HQ with an alpha channel added (for transparency). 

     

    Apple just out with somethirrg on native editing; notice that h.264 was not among those that will edit well. It will edit but it's easier in Pro Res…and it's my opinion that Pro Res treats graphics and text better. Whether it exports faster, I'm not sure. As I said I find exporting Pro Res to be rather painless,

     

    Good luck.

     

    Russ

  • by wyljon,

    wyljon wyljon Jun 3, 2012 12:43 AM in response to Russ H
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Jun 3, 2012 12:43 AM in response to Russ H

    I am much obliged to you Russ.  Thank you.  Johnny