Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

Where is the 17" MBP in the new product line?

I hope that Apple plans on making a 17" MBP with the new features, including the screen and thinner and lighter like the other sizes. Otherwise that will just suck!



15.4" is nice, but 17" screen is just that much better. With the higher resolution, it would be awesome.

Mac OS X (10.7)

Posted on Jun 11, 2012 3:55 PM

Reply
245 replies

Jan 4, 2013 4:37 PM in response to BarefootHank

I love your ideas about a 19" MBP with all the features. I would buy one.



As far as dark side machines go, I also have no problem going back to PCs / laptops like the one you describe. You do get a lot for your money. I like OSX, but no matter what others say about W7, ithas a lot of nice interface features that I wish OSX had. I can work in both worlds, so it makes no difference to me.


When my 17" MBP finally dies, I will ahve a tough choice to make.


I am beginning to doubt if Apple will bring the 17" MBP back, which is the main reason I bought a Mac for $3k.



I just upgraded to 16MB RAM and it definitely made a difference. Might get an SSD eventually.

Jan 4, 2013 4:43 PM in response to ArcProjector

Thanks Arc.

And Good point.


But keep in mind, I'm still using my late 2008 MBP17.

I've modded it with 6GB RAM and an SSD. The Solid State Drive makes all the difference, much more so than Memory and you can install it yourself if you're careful.

And yet when the logicboard went on it about a year ago and the AppleCare Warranty was gone, they still took it in at the Eastview Mall Apple Store and shipped it gratis to TX repair center and made it new again for a flat $300.


I don't know if you all are aware of this service, but it doesn't matter what's wrong with your machine.

They will restore it to full glory for right around $300 no matter what they need to replace.

And fast?

Holy moly, I think it was there and back in 3 days OVER THE WEEKEND no less!


Make no mistake, I do love this company.


On the other hand, I need a very large mobile office with plenty of USB3 ports to drive my USB powered portable displays.

And keep in mind also that that Samsung I talk about is 1400 bucks so you can buy two of the darned things for one similarly equipped MBP 17.

Windows 8, once you get past the foofoo crap is absolutely amazing, rock solid and fast as anything.


I do hope Apple puts out a MBP19


Apple takes care of their customers, bottom line.


Hank

Jan 4, 2013 5:28 PM in response to BarefootHank

Hank,



Thanks for that info on keeping even older systems going for an amazing price.



Yeah, I went for the RAM first. Did not want to bother with the SSD this time. I figure to wait a bit longer to see where prices will go, plus, I'd like to get a 1TB drive.



I am very happy with my Mac. I am glad I bought it. If your idea does not ring at Apple and the 17" is dead, I'll probably end up buying one of the MBPs, and buy a desktop Mac. Waiting to see where they go with the MacPro now that the iMac update is done.



I posted my angst to the suggestion site many times as many others hopefully did. Not sure if it really mattered, but at least there was a chance that Apple would take them into consideration.


By the way, it's fun to see the banter. I did not think the original post would keep going like this, but it's a great start to 2013!

Jan 4, 2013 5:35 PM in response to ArcProjector

An SSD is absolutely worthwhile, although the Macbook Pro models (like my two 2008 4,1 units) are unnecessarily hobbled to SATA 1 speeds.


Some companies' SSDs (like OCZ) can have their firmware upgraded inside a Mac, but most require plugging the unit into a Windows box.


Even with the SATA 1 bottleneck, I'd never go back to a mechanical hard drive.

Jan 8, 2013 5:42 AM in response to BarefootHank

Since this event has occured i've bought my low battery with bonus planned obsolescence processor iphone 5, upgraded to the featureless mountain lion and have stopped becoming interested in Apple products. They don't engineer products for me anymore.


I do feel you, my fellow 17 mpb users though, so as i was unsubscribing from this thread wanted to leave you with this that might help..


The other day I was installing windows on my girlfriends rmbp... and realized its could possibly be decent for our needs. When you're in bootcamp, the retina display is used at native pixel resolution, so you actually get 3800 pixels worth of space. The fonts must be run at a higher dpi, and even them im finding that i'm zooming in on web pages even further.. but you DO get a large amount of screen real estate to fit pixels of content on (im thinking us daytraders here). And your eyes are blurry after a while sure. But it does feel like you're using a bigger display due to the resolution (even though the screen is physically near microscopic from what we're used to 🙂


The dual displayports also carry the lack of a decent display a bit further in that context..


Yeah osx's handling of the "retina" properties are what's borked about the rmbp. I without a doubt prefer the windows option of having all the pixels in my control and scaling ui to my taste rather than having osx forcibly assume what resolution it thinks i need. Its actually impressive when run in boot camp.


Hope this helps someone somewhere. Goodbye! Im off to greener technology pastures now! And they do exist!

Jan 9, 2013 6:29 AM in response to stkmks

It just occurred to me...


That the alternative notebook I just bought for day trading is Samsung's top of the line machine.

Call me dense but it never even dawned on me that I bought a notebook from Apple's arch rival.


Now I've already covered how a MBP19 with a .2" thinner lip around the active display would only be a modest amount larger than the original MBP17 and that that would be necessary anyway to make it stand out from the MBP15.4.


What I hadn't really thought about is that Apple is ready to engage Samsung in the TV market but won't hold it's ground in the notebook market?


What?


Are you kidding me?


Apple is actually allowing Samsung to beat it's butt on Apple's home turf...

And then is going to jump into something it's never done before?


That's nuts.

Jan 9, 2013 11:55 AM in response to Gavin Olukoju

I prefer not to tell Apple exactly what size to build, but to suggest that:


1) a physically very large screen portable is an important part of professional use of computers,


2) that it is currently missing from the Apple product line


3) the Retina 15" may be nice, but does NOT satisfy this need.


4) Apple needs to get a physically larger screen in their lineup, or lose the leverage of professional users. "Kick the tires on the Cadillac, and buy the Chevy with confidence."

Jan 10, 2013 9:30 AM in response to BarefootHank

My input to the suggestion cloud:



With the absence of the 17" MBP, many of your long time and even recent converts to Mac are feeling as if Apple has lost it's connection with the people who really valued the 17" MBP over any other MacBook Pro. If you would take the time to look at the community thread "Where is the 17" MBP in the new lineup"' you will see how much this machine means to more people that you think.


One person has discussed that Apple could blow the doors off everyone again, by making a 19" MBP and making such a system so unique that it will have no equal and be in essentially the same footprint as the 17" unit. considering the effort that has gone into the 21" iMac" producing a 19" screen would seem very doable.


Now with Panasonic coming out with a 20" tablet prototype, it seems that a shift to larger "portables" might be worth considering. I am personally still a hardcore traditional laptop user where I want my input devices separate from the screen, and I want my screen vertically orientated. Touch screen is not a big deal for me. So I would prefer a MBP 19"+ not a 19"+ iPad.


The 19" MBP would be a true DT replacement and also be portable enough for those of us who are not challenged by carrying around a 6.6 lb 17" unit today. We know why it's not as light as the other MBPs, but the screen size (not so much pixel density) is what matters.


Of course price point and number of units sold are what we debate about in our threads, but with your present scheme of keeping prices close to previous models while giving more should work for a new 19" MBP.


Sincerely,



17" MBP Early 2011, 2.2 GHz i7, 750 GB HDD, 16MB RAM.

Jan 10, 2013 11:13 AM in response to ArcProjector

Arc:


Thanks for your well-reasoned post. I trust you've sent it to Apple's feedback site, where it's more likely to find its way to minds that matter than it will as a post in this gripe thread.


As another long-time Mac user (since 1986), I too am dismayed at the extinction of the 17" MacBook Pro, as well as Apple's trend toward increasingly closed hardware architecture that offers the user little or no extensibility. Compared to some of Apple's earlier brilliant successes in creating such feature-rich versions in the PowerBook and MacBook Pro series, the current notebook line-up is a regrettable triumph of form over function.


Nevertheless, I realize that this is not the venue to debate Apple's business decisions. The question is, what experiences can we Mac users share that can solve the problem created by the demise of the 17" MBP? Toward that end, I can only summarize the obvious choices already mentioned in this long thread:


  1. Take advantage of whatever repair options are available to keep your existing 17" MBP operating.
  2. If (or when) your beloved 17" MBP does an irreparable crash-and-burn, buy a refurb or used machine from a reputable vendor and keep on truckin'.
  3. Send your heartfelt pleas to Apple feedback for a rebirth of the 17" (...or larger) MacBook Pro.


On that last point, I'm greatly in favor of Barefoot Hank's idea of a 19" MBP. I'm not as adamant about the inclusion of a numeric key pad, but the general concept of a large-screen MBP that essentially would be the Nuclear Laser Turbo-Diesel Supercarrier™ of notebook computers would certainly put Apple back in the limelight at a time when the tech pundits are beating their breasts about the lack of buzz in consumer electronics...some of which is prompted by Apple's conspicuous absence from CES 2013. (See http://www.zdnet.com/why-doesnt-anyone-care-about-ces-oh-wait-apples-not-there-7 000009519/)


But the more relevant point (from Apple's perspective) is this: A full-featured, large-screen, highly extensible, supersized MBP would be the very next Apple product I would buy.

Jan 10, 2013 1:13 PM in response to freevito

I should have mentioned that the post was what I did in fact post to the suggestion box as Hank suggested. I had a while back already asked them to reconsider their decision to bag the 17" as well.



I guess it's wait and see. I am not sure what I will end up doing when the time comes, but will definitely look to keep mine going or get a used or refurb. If I had the cash now, I'd probably go buy 1 or 2 and store them away.



Meanwhile waiting to see what's in store for the Mac Pro given all the promises of a 2013 refresh. That might tell us a lot about what Apple is really thinking.

Where is the 17" MBP in the new product line?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.