I don't agree with the way Apple is handling the problem. However, I can guess at the reasoning behind their response.
1) They cannot offer to replace an LG screen with Samsung because that would be an admission that there are differences in the display. The company needs to keep the stance that the two displays are essentially identical or people will start to complain that they received an inferior product for the same price.
2) Apple will also be unwilling to use the Ripley system to meet display requests from customers. By allowing people to pick their own favorite components you will have all sorts of issues from customers who requests specific manufacturers. Many components in Apple's products will come from multiple sources.
Let's put the two points together. From point #1 Apple will have conceded that one display is better than the other. From point #2 people are allowed to pick their favorite screen. Apple will now have a large inventory of LG screens that they cannot sell.
Fortunately for Apple the rMBP is a niche product which ships in extremely low volumes relative to their other products. The damage to their brand and bottom line will be very limited. They can easily ride this out until the rMBP with Haswell ships next year.
Apples_8212 wrote:
johns1 wrote:
So how should Apple handle this problem?
They should make sure that the people here who have had repeated LG screens with IR get a guaranteed Samsung replacement. If that's only a few 1000 folk, that shouldn't be too hard to do should it?! Instead of some poor folk who have now had to suffer up to 7 bad replacements. It's not a difficult solution for the people who have been affected badly enough to be on here ranting and raving (and rightly so!).
I agree with the earlier post that perhaps Samsung screens also have *some* issues, but they don't have IR, and that is the main issue here. And I'm sure most of the people who've now had multiple bad LGs would feel finally content with a Samsung and to be done with this ridiculous lottery.
While this doesn't solve the actual IR problem, it would be the "right" thing to do in the interim. But the way Apple are handling this (or rather aren't handling it!) is complete BS in my opinion. And I'm not surprised a lot of people are taking their cash elsewhere now.