mittense

Q: MacBook Pro Retina display burn-in?

I first noticed this after my MBP [Retina] had gone to sleep, but: when returning to the login screen (since I have it set to require a password whenever the computer is idle long enough) I noticed what appeared to a very faint ghosting primarily noticeable on darker backgrounds.

 

After messing around with it a bit, there seems to be a fairly consistent in-display ghosting that occurs without much time at all; I was able to leave my screen on (a little above half-brightness) for about 10-15 minutes and the ghosted "burn" would be of the screen I left it on (which I deliberately reconfigured so that everything would be a new position).

 

Has anyone else experienced this? Is this a normal thing that I just have to get used to? It's not really noticeable at all in standard use.

MacBook Pro (Retina, Mid 2012), Mac OS X (10.7.4)

Posted on Jun 16, 2012 10:30 PM

Close

Q: MacBook Pro Retina display burn-in?

  • All replies
  • Helpful answers

first Previous Page 159 of 642 last Next
  • by xoiigvgj ,

    xoiigvgj xoiigvgj Sep 5, 2012 10:54 AM in response to rothtik
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Sep 5, 2012 10:54 AM in response to rothtik

    If I was intentionally trying to cause IR or Burn-in, I would do what you guys are doing.  Leave my machine on a static screen for a long period of time.

     

    I don't care who makes the monitor.   I bet if you do that on samsung it would do the same thing, be it a slightly longer period of time at best.

     

    Nothing is immune to burn-in so the same goes for IR (thats what the screen saver is for, apart from looking cool)

     

    Seems like you guys are burning the monitors and sending them back lol.... or maybe i'm missing something!

     

    btw...I have an LG too

  • by BRanger,

    BRanger BRanger Sep 5, 2012 10:54 AM in response to xoiigvgj
    Level 1 (35 points)
    Sep 5, 2012 10:54 AM in response to xoiigvgj

    xoiigvgj  wrote:

     

    If I was intentionally trying to cause IR or Burn-in, I would do what you guys are doing.  Leave my machine on a static screen for a long period of time.

     

    I don't care who makes the monitor.   I bet if you do that on samsung it would do the same thing, be it a slightly longer period of time at best.

     

    Nothing is immune to burn-in so the same goes for IR.

    Seems like you guys are burning the monitors and sending them back lol.... or maybe i'm missing something!

     

    And you'd be dead wrong.  There is no need to try anything.  I've had 2 and I could simply do some work for 15 minutes and whatever I was doing would be etched into the screen for 15-30 minutes.  That situation just keeps repeating itself.  In addition, one of mine came out of the box with some file icons etched onto the screen and they're still there.

     

    The test is just a quick and dirty way to see what happens, but NO the Samsung doesn't do this even with the test.  I've owned probably a half-dozen Apple notebooks over the past several years, along with various other LCD displays on the desktop or whatever.  NONE of them did this.  Heck everyone's scared of plasma TVs, but I use one exclusively for gaming and it doesn't do this.

     

    It seems there's always someone who doesn't experience the issue that wants to blame all the other victims.

  • by xoiigvgj ,

    xoiigvgj xoiigvgj Sep 5, 2012 11:05 AM in response to BRanger
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Sep 5, 2012 11:05 AM in response to BRanger

    Well I was referring to the posts where they left it on a screen for 30+ minutes. 

    I agree with you though, normal usage should not result with IR

  • by seank92,

    seank92 seank92 Sep 5, 2012 11:14 AM in response to xoiigvgj
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Sep 5, 2012 11:14 AM in response to xoiigvgj

    xoiigvgj wrote:

     

    Well I was referring to the posts where they left it on a screen for 30+ minutes. 

    I agree with you though, normal usage should not result with IR

    my 6 year old dell doesn't burn in, i could probably leave it for 24 hours without issues.

    I did leave my macbook pro for 60 minutes (LG screen) just to ensure it is functioning well

     

    IR is not a normal issue, even with 30 minutes. Now, I agree that if you leave it for 10 hours or something, then yes it is acceptable. But even up to an hour. I do a lot of programming or 3D designing, and i leave notes up sometimes which can lead the screen to be static for 30+ minutes and i need the screen to function rather prefectly. So IR under 3-4 hours in my opinion is unacceptable for a 2200+ laptop

     

     

    But in apple's defense, people also need to realize a bad batch at my local donut store is a couple hundred donuts; a bad batch at LG is probably a few hundred thousand

  • by Drew84,

    Drew84 Drew84 Sep 5, 2012 11:27 AM in response to mittense
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Sep 5, 2012 11:27 AM in response to mittense

    Paid a visit to the Apple Store in Indianapolis over the weekend and spoke with three different "geniuses" and a "tech" about the matter. More or less told them that I'd buy a rMBP on the spot if they could guarantee me one with a Sammy screen (something a few in this thread have been able to do at their local store). Not only were they all clueless to the issue, but didn't even have a reaction when I was able to reproduce the IR on one of their demo machines in less than a minute. Each one kept referencing their warranty and return policy, but couldn't quite grip that I wasn't buying a known faulty machine and driving six hours round-trip to return/repair it. The fella' that I showed the IR to on the demo even had the audacity to tell me "not to listen to what I hear on the internet." So much for quality and good service, Apple...

  • by djs88,

    djs88 djs88 Sep 5, 2012 12:00 PM in response to clipcarl
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Sep 5, 2012 12:00 PM in response to clipcarl

    An update on my replacement that I got yesterday.

     

    I checked it instore for 15-20 minutes and it was absolutely fine.

    I've used it for 1 day, photoshop & web browsing, and I now have IR

     

    And whilst it doesnt look as bad as my previous case of IR, I know it will probably get worse over time.

     

    *Sigh*

  • by djs88,

    djs88 djs88 Sep 5, 2012 12:15 PM in response to djs88
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Sep 5, 2012 12:15 PM in response to djs88

    Out of interest for the LG'ers....

     

    If you take a solid black image and set it full screen & full brightness.....  is your left hand side of the screen slightly yellow, and right hand side a purple?

     

    Not trying to nit-pick. It doesn't affect usage.  I just wondered if it's something everyone has?

  • by xoiigvgj ,

    xoiigvgj xoiigvgj Sep 5, 2012 12:20 PM in response to djs88
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Sep 5, 2012 12:20 PM in response to djs88

    lol...    I just want to enjoy my new MBPR!

    I have an LG...so far haven't noticed any issues. But I'm not about to put my screen full blast brightness

     

    Ignorance is bliss

  • by xoiigvgj ,

    xoiigvgj xoiigvgj Sep 5, 2012 12:37 PM in response to xoiigvgj
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Sep 5, 2012 12:37 PM in response to xoiigvgj

    12345.jpg

  • by Canuck1970,

    Canuck1970 Canuck1970 Sep 5, 2012 12:47 PM in response to seank92
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Sep 5, 2012 12:47 PM in response to seank92

    I don't have a problem with the fact that Apple gets a bad batch of components sometimes. This is normal, believe me. I used to be a manufacturing engineer and I once had to fly across the country to supervise the re-work of a batch of main boards due to a bad processor. This processor was one of 2 that we had qualified for the main board. We ended up having to de-solder all of the processors from manufacturer A and replace them with manufacturer B's processors...on 500 main boards. It was a huge pain, but we did it to make sure that our customers got what they paid for. I sure hope Apple wakes up and does the same.

     

    As for how the IR problem manifests itself, on my machine I can definitely see it under normal use, and it's getting worse. What's normal use? Browsing for several minutes. I can see it within 5 minutes, but, for argument's sake, let's say 30 minutes. Is that really unreasonable? You may not be looking at static web page content for the entire 30 minutes, but the window frame (i.e. the top of the Safari window and the sides) will likely not move. That frame is what I'm seeing on my desktop when I close Safari, regardless of what desktop wallpaper I use, solid or not.

     

    It's unacceptable...period.

  • by Canuck1970,

    Canuck1970 Canuck1970 Sep 5, 2012 12:49 PM in response to xoiigvgj
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Sep 5, 2012 12:49 PM in response to xoiigvgj

    Is this for real or are you joking?

     

    If this IS an actual IR example...

     

    Jeeeeeebuzzzzzz! Doh!!!!

    xoiigvgj  wrote:

     

    12345.jpg

  • by djs88,

    djs88 djs88 Sep 5, 2012 12:54 PM in response to Canuck1970
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Sep 5, 2012 12:54 PM in response to Canuck1970

    LOL. You had me for a minute there! Apt-image too!

  • by quintex,

    quintex quintex Sep 5, 2012 1:08 PM in response to xoiigvgj
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Sep 5, 2012 1:08 PM in response to xoiigvgj

    Please define "normal usage." If you're using an application the UI is usually static. Let's say I'm using Photoshop with my brush palette sitting somewhere on the screen. I decide to move my palette to some other location after 30 minutes because I want to edit that area of the photo. This is extremely common usage.  That area of the screen, with the image persistence from the palette, will become temporarily useless for photo editing. I will have to sit there and wait until the image persistence goes away. I can't image how unproductive this would be.

     

    Given that the rMBP is targeted for Photoshop and other graphic design apps I would say this is a huge problem. Photoshop is the app they used to launch the rMBP and one of the few professional third party apps to be ported for the retina display. They are basically making this laptop useless for the market that it was designed for. I had also posted that my wife would be using this to review MRI images. Those are static images. If she goes from one static image to the next (normal usage) she would misread the MRI scan of someone's brain and be sued for malpractice.

     

    I'm currently typing this post on a Thinkpad T60p with an IPS screen (Flexview). The laptop is over 6 years old and had been used for over 10+ hours almost every day. No image persistence at all. Don't drink the Apple Kool-Aid and believe them when they tell you this is normal. There are currently many vendors offering laptops with IPS displays (Dell, HP, Asus, Samsung, Sony, etc.) and these do not suffer from image persistence. This the first time a high pixel density IPS screen has been done so perhaps there is a learning curve for LG. However, Samsung's high pixel density PLS technology doesn't suffer from image persistence. Apple should be using Samsung exclusively until LG sorts out the issue, even if this delays production.

     

     

     

    xoiigvgj wrote:

     

    Well I was referring to the posts where they left it on a screen for 30+ minutes. 

    I agree with you though, normal usage should not result with IR

  • by Canuck1970,

    Canuck1970 Canuck1970 Sep 5, 2012 1:10 PM in response to quintex
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Sep 5, 2012 1:10 PM in response to quintex

    quintex wrote:

     

    Please define "normal usage." If you're using an application the UI is usually static. Let's say I'm using Photoshop with my brush palette sitting somewhere on the screen. I decide to move my palette to some other location after 30 minutes because I want to edit that area of the photo. This is extremely common usage.  That area of the screen, with the image persistence from the palette, will become temporarily useless for photo editing. I will have to sit there and wait until the image persistence goes away. I can't image how unproductive this would be.

     

    Given that the rMBP is targeted for Photoshop and other graphic design apps I would say this is a huge problem. Photoshop is the app they used to launch the rMBP and one of the few professional third party apps to be ported for the retina display. They are basically making this laptop useless for the market that it was designed for. I had also posted that my wife would be using this to review MRI images. Those are static images. If she goes from one static image to the next (normal usage) she would misread the MRI scan of someone's brain and be sued for malpractice.

     

    I'm currently typing this post on a Thinkpad T60p with an IPS screen (Flexview). The laptop is over 6 years old and had been used for over 10+ hours almost every day. No image persistence at all. Don't drink the Apple Kool-Aid and believe them when they tell you this is normal. There are currently many vendors offering laptops with IPS displays (Dell, HP, Asus, Samsung, Sony, etc.) and these do not suffer from image persistence. This the first time a high pixel density IPS screen has been done so perhaps there is a learning curve for LG. However, Samsung's high pixel density PLS technology doesn't suffer from image persistence. Apple should be using Samsung exclusively until LG sorts out the issue, even if this delays production.

     

     

     

    xoiigvgj wrote:

     

    Well I was referring to the posts where they left it on a screen for 30+ minutes. 

    I agree with you though, normal usage should not result with IR

     

    I agree completely.

  • by MauroCL,

    MauroCL MauroCL Sep 5, 2012 1:23 PM in response to mittense
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Sep 5, 2012 1:23 PM in response to mittense

    Well guys, this is my second LG screen and now I am going for the third one. The first one took three weeks to get the IR, the second just two weeks... Let's see if the timing improves to one week or less! Je je je..

     

    For those trying to get the IR right away on brand new laptops or replaced screen, if is LG it is certainly sure the IR will suddenly appear, just enjoy your laptop while it is OK.

     

    The technical question are: why all of a sudden the IR appears? What is the breaking point for the panel to start failing? Are they actually being affected by degradation of the material? Or signalling issues?

     

    Basically we the early adopters of retina will have to ride the issue until it gets fixed or hoping for Samsung panel... It is absurd to be treated like this, not for the amount of money that we paid for the laptop.. Although I recognise that Apple has been fair accepting the replacement claims so I will keep replacing the screen until it gets fixed or they change my laptop.

first Previous Page 159 of 642 last Next