I've been following this forum for a few weeks now....kept up since page 80 or so (went back and read every post). I wanted to share my experience I just had a half hour ago at one of the NYC apple stores (don't want to get anyone in trouble, so just leaving it at that). I have a MBP mid-late 2007....the screen, according to the genius i just talked to, has some sort of 'short' in it and the only two options is replace or use an external monitor....That was the only 'short term' solution....which just avoids the problem all together, doesn't fix it.....So this got me into my concerns with the rMBP....
I first asked the genius if 'Ripley' existed and if they could look up the components by serial number....He nodded and said that he hadn't heard of them using Ripley to do that specifically, but it was most likely doable....So it DOES exist, for those of you who have had Apple Store staff tell you otherwise.
So he tells me he has to check w/ his manager if this would be doable....I have a friend who is an Apple employee and was going to get me his massive discount...which I came to find (and just FYI for anyone doing this) there is a legal agreement when they make the purchase that you can't return or refund it...just repair....EVEN IF THE SCREEN IS BROKEN they will make you get it repaired instead of swapping out a new machine.
Besides the point....The manager came over and I told him my dilemma because I'm a motion graphics artist and cannot afford to gamble on a faulty LG screen. I referenced this forum and told him about how the screens were being made by both LG and Samsung....he says this is normal that Apple uses multiple suppliers. Why would they use two screens with different technologies? This is the interesting part...he was EXTREMELY ademant that Apple is legally bound to provide rMBP's with IPS technology screens. He said "That's what they advertise and are legally bound to".....So I tell him that this post references the PLS displays from Samsung and he tells me 'I don't follow things like that on the internet....Unless it's from Apple's site..." blah blah blah. So if Apple's legally bound to be selling IPS screens and yet the Samsung ones really ARE PLS screens, seems like they're breaking their own agreement....
He did tell me, however, that if I were to buy one of the in store models and the genius would look up the serials on Ripley (apparently the geniuses are the ones w/ access to it....probably the top manager as well) that he would be totally fine with that....that while they can pick from a "limited subset of machines", as long as it wasn't a built-to-order one, it's doable.
So now the predicament is does one spend $3k+ on an awesome machine with a Samsung display (but can't use the 25% off employee discount), or, as he also suggested, get a REGULAR MBP and just add an SSD because "It's basically the same performance w/o the screen...."
Bottom line, I'm going to keep following this thread until we figure something out. The 2007 laptop is dying on me....like two years ago dying on me....it's in a zombie state.
If anyone has found some legal documentation of Apple specifying that they will ONLY be using IPS technology, please let us know! Clearly the PLS Samsung displays would be against Apple's own agreement and could lead to this problem being made public and escalated.
Thanks for all of the feedback along the way....hopefully everyone's issues get worked out!