Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

Is the MacBook Pro Retina display resolution of 2880-by-1800 a strain on the eyes as I understand the higher the resolution the more strainful the screen can be to the eyes?

Is the MacBook Pro Retina display resolution of 2880-by-1800 a strain on the eyes as I understand the higher the resolution the more strainful the screen can be to the eyes?

iPad 2

Posted on Jun 20, 2012 7:05 AM

Reply
Question marked as Best reply

Posted on Jun 20, 2012 7:14 AM

I would think that it should be just the opposite since the image should be clearer and crisper. The best way to answer your query is to look at the display itself next to a non-retina MBP.


Ciao.

17 replies

Jun 20, 2012 7:32 AM in response to vinay.sujan

vinay.sujan wrote:


Is the MacBook Pro Retina display resolution of 2880-by-1800 a strain on the eyes as I understand the higher the resolution the more strainful the screen can be to the eyes?


Well there are two or three causes of eyestrain with displays different people seem to have.


1: Small type/UI elements


2: Glossy screens


3: Flicker rate



1:

The higher pixel rate combined with the display set at the higher resolution is going to cause UI and type to be smaller and harder to see. In fact it's advised to set OS X to a lower resolouton so it upscales better to match the pixel of the higher display.


Reports coming in say watching HD 1920 x 1080 trailers on the anti-glare 17" is best as the pixel content matches the display almost fullscreen, where on the MBP-R it's upscaled and thus looks blurry.


HD content makers are NOT going to change all their video cameras to support 2880 x 1800 full screen, so in order to get a clearer image playing HD 1080 content, one will have to do so in a smaller window.



2:

The new MBP-R dispalys are 75% less glossy, but not 100% less glossy like the anti-glare models so this can still cause some people problems. This can be lowered to under 1%, however I'm suspecting to do so would be considered giving up a military advantage to China where Apple gets it products made.


3:

I don't know about the flicker rate if it's better or not on the MBP-R's than the previous screens.

Jun 20, 2012 9:49 AM in response to vinay.sujan

vinay.sujan wrote:


Is the MacBook Pro Retina display resolution of 2880-by-1800 a strain on the eyes as I understand the higher the resolution the more strainful the screen can be to the eyes?

It probably would be if you could get that resolution on the screen but you can't. The default resolution is 1440 x 900, and if you choose the "more space" option, the best you get is 1920 x 1200. It's been suggested that SwitchResX would allow use at full resolution but I haven't seen a report from anyone who's tried it.

Jun 22, 2012 8:58 AM in response to FatMac-MacPro

FatMac\>MacPro wrote:


It probably would be if you could get that resolution on the screen but you can't...

This just in - there's a discussion and links here to a script to activate the full 2880 x 1800 resolution of the Retina Display:


http://9to5mac.com/2012/06/21/how-to-run-your-retina-display-macbook-pro-at-full -2880-x-1800-native-resolution/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campai gn=Feed%3A+9To5Mac-MacAllDay+%289+to+5+Mac+-+Apple+Intelligence%29


Not having a Retina Display MBP (yet), I can't try this, and don't know what, if any, unintended consequences the script and running at full resolution might have.

Jun 23, 2012 8:18 PM in response to vinay.sujan

Things on the OSX will look sharper cause the more Pixles they compress the eye will be un-able to see the square pixles making the OSX sharper... But what most people don't understand is the internet is totaly diffrent... what do I mean by this, I mean that the internet is not that Sharp! most websites use a 72DPI resolution because it loads very fast, The Retina Display may make online fonts and text look choppy! making you the user think there is an issue with the graphics card or that you maybe having eye difficulty. This is not the issue... You will notice in the Apple Key Note at WWDC 2012 Apple only says the Retina display will make images for photogrpahers sharper and other images brighter and font sharper.... They never say anything about online interactions because they know the web looks like **** on their new display.


Internet 72DPI looks good on all screens, Even those box monitors cause of their low resolution.

Photographers mainly use 300DPI or larger with their photos. This will look great on a packed pixle screen like retina display.

Internet sites using 225DPI will also look better, but take longer to load, plus i don't know of any sites that use over 72DPI so good luck!


People need to understand how technology works before they hear about it from a big company like Apple or Asus, Samsung etc.. This is just like the Mega Pixles with cell Phone cameras thats been going on forever.


Just cause you have a billion mega pixles does not make your camera better, its about how good your sensor is.

Jun 23, 2012 11:58 PM in response to Jiffer

Jiffer, thank you for your thoughts. I wanted to ask if the resoultion is scaled down to say 1680-by-1050 on the MacBook Pro Retina, would that solve the issue, in particular bearing in mind that the Retina has an IPS display? For instance, If you were looking at the same web site at that resolution on a Retina and a non-Retina MacBook Pro side by side, would the Retina display be better?

Is the MacBook Pro Retina display resolution of 2880-by-1800 a strain on the eyes as I understand the higher the resolution the more strainful the screen can be to the eyes?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.