Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

Does iPhoto really require Mac OS Extended (Journaled) Filesystem?

I have been looking for a way to conveniently share my iPhoto library between the three computers in my house. NAS seems like the right solution, except for this pesky requirement that iPhoto supposedly requires that the library reside on a filesystem with the Mac OS Extended (journaled) format.


I have seen this requirement referred to in several discussion threads, and in articles online, but I haven't found the source of this requirement. The iLife '11 system requirements article in the knowledge base (http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4163) doesn't say anything about filesystem format. And, I have seen a few notes by people who have been running for months with their iPhoto library on a NAS drive (which would be ext3 or ext4 format by default, accessed via AFP).


I have searched through the knowledge base, looked through the online help, and so on. I can't find any official source for this requirement.


Can anybody point me to an official source (support article, forum response by an Apple employee, etc) where this requirement is stated?

MacBook Pro, Mac OS X (10.6.1)

Posted on Jun 25, 2012 12:48 PM

Reply
15 replies

Jun 25, 2012 1:14 PM in response to DelegatorNH

Not that I know of - there are hundreds of posts from people who have lost data due to having their iPhoto library on an incorrectly formatted volume - and I believe that because of this problem iPhoto '11 will not even try to use other formats


If you do a simple Google search you will find many references to this requirement - for example http://www.maclife.com/article/howtos/how_share_your_iphoto_library_networked_st orage


Experiment - you are free to do what you want - just be aware you are putting your photos in jeopardy


LN

Jun 25, 2012 3:00 PM in response to Yer_Man

Thanks, Terence, that is exactly what I was looking for. If anybody from Apple is looking, that KB article should be tagged as being applicable to iPhoto as well as Aperture.


And Niel, I think I'll take your advice. I've seen that solution mentioned elsewhere, but was hoping to avoid the extra step of mounting the disk image if possible. Or rather, I was hoping to avoid having to instruct my wife to mount the disk image in order to access the library. But this seems the best solution for what I want to do.

Aug 22, 2013 4:53 PM in response to Yer_Man

Is this still true? I just got off the phone with WD tech support. If I understood correctly,

he said that while their "My Book Live Personal Cloud Storage" is actually EXT3, the

drive's native OS will communicate via AFP making the network drive capable of handling

iphoto, itunes and time machine.


But I have my doubts. Any other wisdom or experience on this? Not wanting to shell out
for a TIme Capsule...

Aug 23, 2013 12:15 PM in response to Yer_Man

Sorry. Investigating putting iphoto on a drive that is available via wifi to any of multiple

laptops in my home with iphoto installed. Also, want to be able to use time machine for

these machines without plugging the laptop into an external disk drive.


A NAS is the obvious choice, but as you know most (if not all) cannot be formatted

extended/journaled. Except the time capsule. Actually, I guess I'm assuming it is

formatted correctly. Is it?


I understand some of the risks of iphoto over wifi, dropped signals leading to corrupt

photos and databases etc. Also, even if I can get everything AC, wifi might still be too

slow. But I'm just exploring my options.


Basically saying "go get the other computer" or "take the computer over there" is a

deal breaker for everyone else in my household.


And realistically, when the "Backup" reminder pops up Sunday eves, it seems I'm all too

likely to ignore it :\

Does iPhoto really require Mac OS Extended (Journaled) Filesystem?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.