Joinging the Club!
Same problem with a 27' iMac (mid-2010 purchased brand new, 2 years ago) with all latest updates on Mountain Lion 10.8.3.
The symptoms started few weeks ago only, on a computer that has been ON 24x7 for almost 2 years with screen saver and energy saver options ON.
Before searching for this problem on the support communities, I also figured out that forcing the computer to go to sleep and awaking it would solve the problem temporarily for few minutes to few hours.
I will go to the nearest Apple Store to check what is the local Apple response to this problem.
If this problem is confirmed, even though not acknowledged by Apple, being an "engineering issue" (ironic expression for what looks like a major design/aging failure), I bet Apple will do its best to avoid recalling.
There are potentially about millions of units at stake...
If I may comment one thing about all the attempts I have read to find "workarounds".
I must say that in the Spirit of what Steve Jobs would have said himself, I have not purchased a 2000€+ computer that I use for ordinary computer use (no CAD, no Video/Picture editing, no Hard core gaming, etc.) to have to find any "workaround" to such a major design/aging failure.
2 years is not that old for a domestic computer of this price despite whatever planned obsolescence.
I want and I need to use my computer "as is", without having to blow air to its chassis, change the internal cooling patterns, load any software (not included in the OS or one of its patches so tested and supported by Apple) to reconfigure anything, forcing low or high backlight of the screen, etc.
It has to work for what I have bought it for and the way I want itperiod]
I understand all those attempts were meant to avoid the cost of "repairs".
But hold on a minute, this is not a failure.
The screen stills works as far as I am aware so why should I change it.
It just do not perform what it should which is a completely different matter.
Forget about being fooled by an internal “computerized cable”.
The screen system in its entirety just do not fulfill its duty while it is not broken[end of the story].
Why would I pay for fixing something that is not broken?
A design failure or a component that does not age well on a fair use is not a failure.
I never heard of “wearing parts” for computer cables.
I'd accept it for a hard-disk of for a LCD screen beyond 8 years but not after 2! I've got a Sony LCD monitor that is 12 years old and that still works perfectly.
Is AppleCare a way to make us pay for something badly designed?
Are we so scared an Apple product would fail that not only we do accept CONSCIOUSLY to paid a premium but also we feel the need to secure this by an extra-premium warranty?
As a matter of principle WHY would I pay for anything beyond the legal warranty when one of the reason why we buy Apple products is for their specifications, performances and reliability?
After two years of service I could (hardly) accept the argument of a failure if the screen would permanently go off. This is not the case. It works when lit.
So I consider it as a design failure or a component aging too early despite a fair use.
I bought it so I could use it this way and the promise is just not kept.
I want my money back ! LOL
As I read it many times in this thread, I've been myself a (late but ever since then) quite loyal Apple customer (all iPhones collection, iPad, iMac, an actual fanboy...).
I do not expect to be treated like a king for such reason but simply as a CUSTOMER.
Which means someone with the choice to choose a competitor when not satisfied: products, specifications - including reliability, prices and SERVICE!
As Jobs said it himself in many of his interviews, I buy Apple products (at such more expensive prices than their competitions) because they are (were...) better and satisfy (ied) me.
If these conditions are not meet anymore, my loyalty will go to the next in line providing those qualities especially for these level of prices.
This is not a treat, this is the deal with Apple!
If there isn't much competition right now, there will be soon if Apple carries one this way.
Alternately I'd go for a cheap solution and then would not complain when they do not stand their promises (they promise less generally...).
I don't know about Apple becoming "anything" since Jobs passed away, or whichever new market they might be chasing now.
What I know for sure is that they should not consider their existing customer base as locked in their ecosystem. Apple's success since the iPod/iPhone/iPad was due to the excellence of these products which condemns Apple to excellence in all their product lines, especially the expensive ones. As I said, I've switched from Windows to OS X therefore PC to Mac after the positive experience of the iPhone.
I will switch to other options if necessary.
Pascal - Paris area France