Retina Vs. Non Can you notice?

I've finally decided to buy a new MacBook Pro (meaning my wife said I could), so we headed to the Apple store.

Problem was, when we got there we couldn't see the difference. Let me correct myself in saying, we couldn't see the $1000 difference.

Sure the icons looked better, the sales rep pointed out it was less reflective. But we walked out undecided.

For the basic coding, college papers, and script writing that I do even the sales person said it might not be worth it.

So I'm planning on doing an ssd upgrade and ram upgrade on the nonretina MBP.


Anyways, just wondered if anyone else was on the fence and seeing them in person didn't make it "clearer".

Also, if it was an AMAZING DIFFERENCE for you. What did you look at or what do you do on it? I told myself I'd go back and look again, just to be sure.

Thanks for any tips or comments.

MacBook Pro with Retina display, iOS 5.1.1

Posted on Jun 27, 2012 6:33 PM

Reply
17 replies

Jul 6, 2012 12:15 PM in response to clintonfrombirmingham

As much as I hate to be "that" guy...I've been checking out the display a lot and I've grown to like it. REALLY LIKE IT.

The text is clearer. The icons and menu are clearer.

Plus I was planning on spending soo much on the SSD and ram boost, when in October the 13 inch should have a retina release. So I'd be paying close to that price, but with an old screen. And when you take the time to compare them, it's crazy what you see. I'm amazed at how bad the 13 Mbp looks, considering my devices now aren't close to it's resolution. And I've heard the retina screens look better on smaller devices.

The factors I'd lose like the fixability and upgrades, I'll have to live without.

The cd might be taken out, but an external isn't so much, plus I do hardly use one now.


Anyways, official verdict: 13 inch MBP Retina


15 retina is too much, the 13 should be cheaper and right around the corner. As long as it has a slimmer profile, ssd standard, and is noticeably faster than the air. Noticeably being the key word. If not, I will have waited for nothing, because the air with retina will be around the corner from that, and be lighter.


I just want to say, while I'm sure someone out there looks at this post like I'm playing the waiting game, and technology is always going to get better, double resolution in the screen is quite a jump compared to deciding to wait between the sandy bridge vs ivy bridge or 2.3 i5 vs the 2.7 i5...or even 3.5 pounds vs 4.5 pounds. Double resolution from retina won't be right around the corner, faster, stronger, lighter will be.

Jul 12, 2012 3:22 PM in response to Mac1ofEach

Display can look awesome ... however you need an image that can show it off.

so ... finding that just right wallpaper


As for standard apps ... definitely crisper text. I have to sit fairly close to notice it.


FAST ... this thing boots amazingly fast. Apps load fast. The SSD is amazing


LIGHT ... I cant go back to my 'old' macbook pro .. its way too heavy


Don't focus on the display as the decision point. However do focus on the weight, and speed. The display's a bonus.


This is my 3rd 15" macbook pro, and I've been using it 3 weeks now. I don't regret the decision to upgrade.

Jul 12, 2012 5:03 PM in response to MBPr

I thought that un-optimized Apps, such as Office etc, look out of focus almost, jaggy, or is there a resolution for this (no pun intended:) until new programs come out utilyzing the potential of the screen that works now? Since I've never seen Office loaded on a computer at the Apple store, its difficult to check it out for myself. Anyone else had a chance to use the Retina with any of the Office programs or other un-optamized apps.?

Jul 12, 2012 5:48 PM in response to Barry Fisher

I've had my MBA i7 1.8GHz 256FD and 4GB's of ram (2011 mode)l for a year now and wished I waited for this years model mainly for the 8GB's of RAM and USB 3.0. But my MBA is by far the best Apple laptop Ive ever owned, and I've owned a few. I've still got my 2006 Black Macbook (can't get rod of it) with a SSD.


I purchased the June 2012 13.3" Macbook Pro i7, but returned it without opening it.........because I decided I want the 13.3" rMBP. 1280 X 800 is down right shamefull even thought the color is premo. 1440 X 900 is the minimum I will ever except on a 13.3" Mac.😝

Jul 13, 2012 10:39 PM in response to Barry Fisher

I've seen Office on the new retina, they installed it at the Best Buy near us, probably for a customer. It looked fine, I agree, once they update programs (for that screen) most will look better. But it still looks better than a non-retina overall.


But to me, I've looked at so many laptops lately and the retina has ruined them. You instantly look for that kind of quality, but they're all so fuzzy.


If you don't want to spend the extra money, don't go look! It's all downhill from there.


In the end, (if you're buying one, not for those who already bought) right now, there's only a few programs that will really shine with the new resolution, but it's better to buy it and watch the quality get better, than buy one now, knowing that's as good as it's going to get.

Jul 13, 2012 10:57 PM in response to softwater

That's one of the points that I try to make to folks, too. These are two machines - 13" and 15" with an outstanding display but no major support yet to take advantage of the display's native mode. That might be a year away, two years, who knows? Only when high-res displays start showing up en masse on Windows machines, I feel, will we see software vendors making an effort. I could be wrong, but I doubt that you'll ever see, for example, a Retina version of Office 2011...


Just my 2¢...


Clinton

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Retina Vs. Non Can you notice?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.