It' s not necessarily the laptop that needs recalls.
Often, it's been the battery.
There are not uncommon reports that replacing the battery has restored battery life.
Only when the battery swap fails does Apple essentially replace the [warranty covered] Macbook (motherboard swap is almost like getting a new one.)
I'm an ACMT and the training one takes to get certified repeats ad nauseam that when working inside a laptop to cover the battery. The batteries are downright fragile. Expecting users to protect the battery by monkeying around inside their laptops is likely foolish so making macbooks very difficult to get inside serves the purpose of protecting users from themselves.
Problem is, when a known hardware issue like this cannot be solved by the end user, it can prove to be magnitudes more expensive if it's going to take professional, HIGHLY skilled intervention to solve it.
I'd like to take this opportunity to encourage Apple to take this experience into account in future designs to return Macbooks to their roots a little and make more components user replaceable / repairable. I won't be so cynical as to imply that making their products "black boxes" is deliberate to sell more product, I prefer the "paternal protection" hypothesis, but the case stands.
If batteries were user replaceable, then the Mountain Lion battery life issue might not have been so daunting. The nasty shock people had when they discovered their iPods would die when the battery did wasn't the devastating blow it could have been, but the tolerance people have for "disposable" electronics may have a limit. It's NOT environmentally sound to build product like this and dissuades value shoppers. Resale value could plummet and resale has been a selling point I've always mentioned with Macs. You just do NOT save that much buying used because people tend to keep them until they die. If they die quickly and irrevocably, you've gone from high resale to none and the value of the purchase is jeopardized.
I have not yet heard a refutation of the idea that Macbook batteries have design tolerances that present no problems for Mac OS through 10.7 and something in OS 10.8 pushes batteries to performance levels that causes otherwise good batteries to malfunction. Batteries in production now may have solved the problem, but replacing the existing ones will be pricey.
Even though 207 pages of responses indicates a serious issue, Apple has sold millions of these things so the problem may be relatively minor, speaking in terms of raw numbers of incidens, not in emotional trauma, or reputation to the brand.
Closing shout out:
Csound1: Do you have any guesses as to why OS 10.8 triggers the problem? It seems you find the concept of "charging algorithms" to be manure. It may well be. I do not profess knowledge of the engineering involved, but maybe you do and wouldn't mind sharing either information or wild guesses?