Hi sgaske,
what has manifested here is indeed ignorance and a lack of understanding but unfortunately it is Apple who has shown these things.
The first rule is that the customer is always right and if you think that pointing out the little "1" and saying we legally covered ourselves and it was up to you to do your research is going to reduce the anger in question then your understanding of the psycology of the average Apple buyer is sadly a little off. We all expect more from Apple and we expect it all to work and we expect to be informed when it does not. This is the bar that Apple has set for itself and it has failed to manage our expectations appropriately.
If this happened with a Microsoft product I would not be upset, my bar for Microsoft products is pretty low but with Apple I expect more, I pay more and I expect more.
Apple understands this and I think that they accept that this could have been done better, why otherwise would I have been given a complete refund (and itunes store credits) if they didnt think that they were wrong.
My anger is from failed expectations and that is why others are angry too. They have been let down by their gods and are rightly questioning the faith.
You, as a more technically minded Apple user, see the futility of this anger (you cannot, as you rightly point out, give a chip capabilities that are not already hardwired in) and feel that others should have researched more before buying but you are not seeing that the majority of buyers out there are not technical and just expect it work because Apple have been very good at doing and selling this in the past.
Anyway, at the end of the day this is all just my opinion on expectation management. I see a fail and you see ignorant people. These are two valid sides of the picture