Netgear RP614 or firewire connection?

I've just moved house and in the new place we have got cable broadband instead of ASDL, so my old ASDL netgear router:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0000E0YHF/qid=1143381121/sr=1-4/ref=sr1_194/202-6859255-8951068

doesn't work.

Now the choices are either buy this Cable router:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/tg/stores/detail/-/electronics/B000087H96/** stomer-reviews/ref%3Dord%5Fcart%5Fshr/202-6859255-8951068

or by a long firewire lead and share my internet connection via firewire. I'm only connecting two computers.
Would the router be worth buying for the firewall alone? and the reliabilty?

any advice would be wicked!

cheers

Dual 1.8 G5, Mac OS X (10.4.3)

Posted on Mar 26, 2006 5:53 AM

Reply
10 replies

Mar 26, 2006 10:16 AM in response to Martin Stacey

If not the Netgear, then one of them many other DSl/Cable routers with built-in firewalls. I would not let any computer of mine sit directly connected to the Internet at any time.

Get the router and use its built in NAT services to hide your computers local IP's from prying eyes, and it's built-in firewall to hide all of the network ports from anyone wanting to attempt to connect to your LAN.

Other DSL/Cable routers to consider are those from:
Netgear
Dlink
Linksys
Belkin
Zyxel
and others.

I particularly like the Zyxel P334, P334WT, for home consumer router. and the Zywall services of Internet Security appliances for small business use. But any of them from the list above should work well for consumer home applications

Tom N.

Mar 26, 2006 2:11 PM in response to Martin Stacey

I think the Netgear is a good router. I have a few Netgear switches here and have been happy with how they work. I mentioned the other manufacturers just in case you or anyone else was also looking.

As to the p334, I tend to mention it for home use because it is usually one of the least expensive routers available that also includes stateful packet inspection as part of the firewall, as well as IPSec VPN support and a very good NAT system that support various NAT implementations including one to one, many to one, many to many and other multi-nat configurations, which can very handy if you have multiple global IP's and/or will be using servers in your home.

So I guess I think it is just a good bargain at its price point.

However, the Netgear is also a fine router.

Tom N.

Mar 26, 2006 3:13 PM in response to Martin Stacey

It's not a matter of the firewall in OS X or any OS for that matter being good enough, it's a matter of where is the better location for the firewall. At the Network source, before anything can get into your home network and computers, or at your computers.

To me the better location is at the Internet source, to separate your local LAN from the Internet and ensure there is no access between them, except via the firewall and NAT. I would even setup a router with a good firewall for a LAN that had only a single computer on it and nothing else.

Tom N.

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Netgear RP614 or firewire connection?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.