presets don't seem to do what they promise...

so i have an edit that is 1h49m15s long, compressed using "best quality 120 minutes - 4:3" preset (dual pass)
i have audio compressed to both ac3 and aif
when i use both the m2v and the ac3, dvd studio pro tells me that my disc will be 5.3GB
in other words; "120 minutes best" preset does not seem to produce files that fit 120 minutes on disc...

when i open the preset in the inspector, the quality inspector tells me "allows up to 94 minutes of video on a DVD-5"
i've tried squeezing the average bit rate down until it would read "allows up to 120 minutes on a DVD-5" but the resulting file is still too big to fit...

i'm using using menus with 30 second video, but that doesn't take up more than 50 MB and so does not explain the 600 MB size problem...

mac os 10.4.5
compressor 2.01
quicktime 7.0.4
dvd studio pro 4.0.3

is this a problem others have seen as well?
or am i missing something obvious?

thanks

Mac OS X (10.4.5)

Posted on Mar 29, 2006 12:26 AM

Reply
13 replies

Mar 29, 2006 11:53 PM in response to Houghts

yes that's what i noticed too.
unfortunately, the difference is a bit bigger than the amount that dvdsp's disc size meter is out...

i currently have 4 or 5 projects of this size to finish all with similar durations and problems. yesterday i tried building some of them and ended up with builds that were too big for the medium (5GB or over)

my biggest problem is predictability in compressor;
in the inspector panel, only the slider for the average bitrate seems to affect the prediction of how many minutes will fit on a disc while the slider for maximum bitrate has to be used in the blind as compressor's preview is utterly useless. it bares no resemblance to what i see on the television after burning....

generally, it would be nice if a preset that advertizes to fit 120 minutes on a dvd5 disc, would _actually be able to fit 120 minutes on a disc and not waste 6+ hours in rendering only to find out that it is 500+MB too big...
(and this is rendering on a quad processor machine...)
</rant>

Apr 1, 2006 6:30 PM in response to rene beekman

I should add that once I realised the presets were basically Mickey Mouse, I used 2 different bitrate calculators. They both produced virtually the same result, so I then set the rate manually. Burnt my project as CBR 5 Mbps.

Luckily I have something to show for all my frustrations with Compressor. And luckily all my dissolves and opticals, as well as the whole video, looks very good quality wise.

I count myself extremely lucky (that word again) that I am not experiencing all the other Compressor problems that I read about on this forum.

As I am not prepared to spend one cent more to fix Final Cut Studio, I'm afraid BitVice is out of the question.

Regards. Robert.

Apr 3, 2006 4:27 PM in response to rene beekman

Hi Rene

In addition to using the 2 bitrate calculators,I also tried the DVDSP User Manual formula (page 42). I measured the size of my compressed 12 DVD elements (6 m2v & 6 ac3) before burning. They totalled 4.07 GB (excluding motion menu), so I knew the project would fit on a single layer DVD.In my case using CBR I knew that 5 Mbps would be the maximum.

My feeling is that your project SHOULD fit, irrespective of what the presets say. It's the same duration as my project more or less. But it seems like you haven't had any success so far 😟

Regards. Robert

Apr 4, 2006 1:59 AM in response to Robert Downunder

it __should fit but it did not - and i only found out after i had rendered the project and mastered the dvd (as noted here, the disk size meter in dvdsp is off), forcing me to re-do about 3 hours of work.
as i will need to master 3 to 5 discs of this size per day in the coming months, it seems compressor will simply not do.
am currently running tests with bitvice and megapeg.x to see how they hold up.
so far, i'm partial to megapeg's approach of emphasizing max bitrate and quantization floor as those two are a lot more important for what you eventually see on the monitor than the "average bitrate"

thanks for all the suggestions so far

Apr 5, 2006 3:08 AM in response to rene beekman

am currently running tests with bitvice and megapeg.x
to see how they hold up.
so far, i'm partial to megapeg's approach of
emphasizing max bitrate and quantization floor as
those two are a lot more important for what you
eventually see on the monitor than the "average
bitrate"


That may be true, but "max bitrate" and "quantization floor" cannot give you any control over the final file size. Only the "average bitrate" can do this.
BitVice takes your average bitrate setting VERY seriously. This is why you can trust BitVice not to generate bigger files than you ask for.
Divide the file size (in bits) by the duration (in seconds), to get the average bitrate that your encoder generated, as opposed to what you told it to do;-)

Roger Andersson / Innobits AB, makers of BitVice MPEG-2 Encoder for Mac

Apr 5, 2006 4:22 AM in response to Roger Andersson

roger,
good to see you here online too 🙂

That may be true, but "max bitrate" and "quantization
floor" cannot give you any control over the final
file size. Only the "average bitrate" can do this.


while it is frustrating when you end up with an m2v that's too big for the disc it was supposed to fit onto, my clients tend to make a bigger fuss out of blockiness and other compression artifacts

and probably the ultimate encoding is a good balance between all 3 parameters - so far however encoders seem to fall into two categories, both emphasizing a different subset of these or a different combination of these.
which works for you may then also depend on your way of looking at the problem...

Divide the file size (in bits) by the duration (in
seconds), to get the average bitrate that your
encoder generated, as opposed to what you told it to
do;-)


that's what failed for me with compressor - resulting in 5+GB discs for 1h50m of material, using the 120 minute per disc preset....
btw audio was ac3 at 192

This is why you can trust BitVice not to generate bigger files than you ask for.


still looking forward to that version 1.7 of bitvice later this week to finally see how it will do on a quad g5 🙂

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

presets don't seem to do what they promise...

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.